My comment referred to the incorrect info from the Ourisman Ford message in chlâs post:
âLast but not least, the Max Trailer Tow Package (available only with Extended Range Battery) increased $100 to $1100.â
Most truck tonneaus are soft, not hard. The negative aerodynamic effect of flapping canvas (even very slight flapping) is probably worse than no tonneau at all. Best bet for improved drag coefficient would be low-profile hard tonneau (it must be rigid).
I think EV purchases in 2023 need to be made with an eye toward the future: software updates will happen as operating data accumulates. As 350kW+ DC fastcharging becomes commonplace, and if data-from-experience confirms safe charging at higher power levels, software updates will allow faster...
Supply voltage is also a variable- at home I have 240v, at work about 205v; while the allowable current seems fixed by the EVSE (or the vehicleâs charger), the lower voltage (205vac) results in about 15% lower kW into the vehicle.
If even trim level is not IDâd in VIN, then how does IRS confirm EV Tax Credit qualification, including MSRP? Is there a database, looking up MSRP by VIN? I doubt it- and I further doubt that IRS has ability to tell the difference between a $79,000 and an $81,000 Lightning, except as part of a...
It seems likely to me that â22-â23 SR packs may be replaceable with SR packs from the new plant (USA) Ford is building with CATL (Chinese global leader in LFP battery technology). MME is getting these LFP packs in 2024. Likely same or smaller size pack, but potentially more usable range...
Options offers protection in case residual values of 2023 Lightnings tank in 2026. Who knows? There may be much more attractive vehicles on the market then, and several more E-trucks. Options plan transfers the excess-depreciation risk to Ford (much like a lease does, but since Options is...
How can you get more than 11.5kW from 48Ax240v? Are you confusing âkWh addedâ with kW charging rate? (are your numbers 17.5, 13.1, and 4.3, kW or kWh?)
The rate for home charging is voltage (usually around 220v) x charger current setting (usually 40A on NEMA 48-50 outlet); so, 8.8kW from start to finish (rate doesnât throttle down like in fast DC charging, so thereâs really no need to monitor home charging rated ).
Iâm not sure itâs fair to blame Ford delays for the unfair aspects of the EV Tax Credit.
If EV adoption is the goal, then why does it matter who buys them? (aka income limits)
Why does it matter what the price of the EV is? (the are plenty of ICE choices above $80k, why shouldnât we incentivize...
The âlow-hanging fruitâ is not more range, but FASTER FDC CHARGING rates. More range is not the answer (thatâs ICE-thinking), itâs faster charging that will make all the difference. Increase the pack voltage to at least 400v, solve the associated technical challenges, and the Lightning will be...
Teslas are not just smaller, aerodynamic, and with lower rolling-resistance tires. Teslaâs thermal management and power regeneration are best-in-class. If Tesla made a light truck (and someday they will), it would be a 2-3mi/kWh marvel. The Tesla Semi has 1.7mi/kWh efficiency, for crying out...
Fast DC charging (non-Tesla) is the âillegitimate childâ of the EV industry- no one loves it, and no one will accept responsibility for it!
The solution is simple, really: if fast dc charging was offered at $1/kWh, no operator could afford to have a charger down, and there would be a waiting...
A funny thing happened on the way to âsaving the planetâ: EVs got good- really good- on their automotive transportation merits alone. With due apologies to tree-huggers, even if my two EVs generated MORE emissions than ICE vehicles, I would still want to own them. Power, convenience...
Longer range only matters on the way to the first charging stop. Would you really want to wait long enough to recharge a 400mi battery pack? Experience with Tesla has taught me that the most pleasurable road-tripping comes from a 20min charging stop every 100-150mi. I discovered early-on that...