Sponsored

Search results

  1. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Yikes….. Something seems very borked. I wonder if it’s worth taking to the dealer for a complete reset?
  2. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Have you done any troubleshooting of the issue like 12v disconnect? It is interesting the behavior changed. I wonder if it’s running the ā€œnormalā€ map instead of the ā€œsportā€ hence the difference you’re feeling, especially on regen.
  3. If the Ramcharger were available when you bought your lightning...

    For me, likely no. For those who tow regularly, it’s certainly a compelling option. I wanted a 100% battery electric vehicle as I already have a PHEV. Im a big fan of several of the RAMs features, expecially the Klipsch sound system which I’m sure blows the 8 speaker B&O out of the water. That...
  4. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    All of this arguing and posturing is becoming boring. The difference between our positions is I’ve provided hard numbers as an actual benchmark, while you’re suggesting there’s a better alternative while not actually citing the benchmark. Speaking of being obtuse, I think you know the nuance...
  5. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Are you for real? You mean the memo about the truck that was distributed to hundreds of dealers didn’t come from Ford? 🤣 Again we do have official data from Ford on various trims, you just don’t seem to want to look for it and that’s fine. The difference here is the community (media) backs up...
  6. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Indeed kW is power…. It’s been a long day. Again, the point still stands. How many amps should owners of each pack expect to see? To answer your question, Ford.com has published all the 0-60 times over various model years. Right now it appears to only have the 2025 Lariat ER posted at 3.8...
  7. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Indeed, there are many variables. Yet on dry and clean asphalt in temps above 50F should be within a tenth or two with a single occupant in the truck. Again, ford has published the times for each truck model accounting for the different weights and wheel and tire options. Furthermore Car and...
  8. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Totally agree. However the 0-60 times are published by Ford, so there is an actual benchmark. Is maximum current limit published for each pack?
  9. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Woof indeed. Of course the HVB current has a predefined max, that’s why we don’t have 2,000hp trucks. However you still need to hit conditions where the truck will ask for the max, then you need to know what the max should actually be. To make this more interesting, the max will vary between...
  10. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    I mean you literally brought it up, but ok….. Also HVB current is no more accurate than a 0-60 run. You’re at WOT for about 4 seconds getting meaningful data. Also HVB current is susceptible to TC pulling power to manage traction. So unless it’s is known what the HVB current should be at a...
  11. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Was someone advocating for 1/4 mile times to troubleshoot?
  12. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Again, this is great stuff. It would be nice seeing a result with no TC just to remove that variable, but otherwise your process seems reasonable. This leaves you with two outcomes: 1. Due to the cold temperatures, traction issues are slowing you down by about 0.5s. 2. You’re also impacted my...
  13. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    100%. TC should always be off when doing benchmarking runs. That said Fords numbers can be replicated on a non-prepped surface. I’m looking forward to the spring so I can get some runs at the track!
  14. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    This is good stuff right here! So a few things, you’re getting 4.1-4.2 0-60MPH because you’re likely calculating without the 1ft rollout that Ford utilizes. When you remove the 1ft rollout you get a 0-60MPH run in ~4.16 seconds. So in March you were dead on. Now for your run yesterday, was the...
  15. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    So I went back through the last page or two and I see where the potential misunderstanding is. I take it you’ve edited some of your comments after posting? I swear upon initial read, some of the context currently there was not present. I’m in total agreement normal and sport absolutely feel...
  16. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Speaking of reading, you should read my comments to you. Nowhere do I question that the drive mode changed on its own, so not sure why you keep litigating it….. However what I keep pointing out is there is NO change in available power between normal and sport. However your comment said when...
  17. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    You could do that, or you could test your current 2024 truck which you feel is slower. The expected 0 to 60 is a known quantity. Not sure why it’s so difficult.
  18. Slight Reduction In Acceleration. Has Anyone Else Experienced This Issue.

    Didn’t miss that at all. Again, going from sport to normal involuntarily or not doesn’t make the truck slower…… Ford can limit your speed. However you’ve presented zero evidence to show that your truck is slower…… Btw the power curve is the same for all drive modes, the main difference is...




Top