Search results

I saw that on Wikipedia.

I have seen several times that SK On was a LG spinoff, but taking a brief look around, I don't see anything supporting that.Maybe misunderstood or something. So SK On it is. I would still lemon law the truck for reasons stated.

IMHO Lemon Law while you can. Obviously LG was not having a good day/week that your battery cells were manufactured. Once, Ok, things happen Twice... And things just got very very suspect.

Seems the great and mighty can do no wrong Tesla couldn't or wouldn't meet their NEVI obligations in Oklahoma. So much for the ideal Tesla should have gotten the NEVI funding. https://electrek.co/2024/12/03/tesla-loses-out-to-evgo-in-oklahomas-nevi-ev-charger-rollout/

I have used P&C for both EA and Tesla. You are not double billed. You are billed the non-member rate for the site through your Ford account. You WIL NOT get a discounted price even if you are a member for a lower kwh rate. It has worked very well for me to date

Transformers are extremely expensive, and the charger units are as well. Then there is engineering and construction.

Than you, Good to know. Key ofy point is that Tesla is doing no better on the NEVI sites than anyone else, and in fact have issues deploying at already permitted sites.

OP says those things are just self inflicted waste! Checks and balances don't matter. Just give Tesla all the money so their share price goes up. Thing is, you absolutely don't want one dominant player. Tesla got an exemption they should not have gotten IMHO to qualify for NEVI funding...

You stated NEVI, and I and others have shown how that can't be concluded at this time. Just because you don't like the answer isn't my problem. Reality is different from what you stated. I'm done with you as you obviously have made up your mind and will not change it. So this is a waste of time

OP, you are showing a complete lack of understanding of what is required. Yet you somehow believe you are qualified to pass judgement. How are you supposed to change a 2 year wait for transformers, or that utilities doing things when they feel like it? You claim your precious post was about...

Not going to bother to argue. Just point out that slow does not equal wasted. State DOT's had to organize entirely new management groups, those groups had to learn what they were doing, then had to acquire data, analyse that data, figure out how much and best use of money allocated, and some...

I got it too.

Check the other thread on what's being recalled, but I think it was accepted that adapter is being recalled had the 00-D that is seem in the second line of text in your photo.

I think the bigger picture is being missed here. Yes it's about EVs and updating transportation, but it's more than that too. Subsidies for Vs and batteries now, are building a foundation for bigger things. Just like the early days of the computer. The ev's just provide an early marketable...

Best bang for the ev truck buck.

I am of the opinion, that charging to 100% occasionally is needed for BMS calibration and leveling. Question is, how often? Idk, but I would not do so more frequently than every 6-9 months in typical use. That typical use to me means level w charging to 80ost of the time, with occasional fast...

IMHO, it's a ploy to paint only one dull color, and then upcharge people for anything else. Much like Tesla. Cut their cost and increase revenue at the same time.

No recall notice as of yet anyway. Still going to set the adaptor aside for the time being as I kept my A2Z adapter. August 15th here. No recall notice. Original order number 95xx I think it was. Delivery in September.

I haven't looked at the screen in my truck for the reported update, but I wonder if Ford pass is reporting 6.2.2 and the truck screen will show 6.2 for whatever reason? Will try to check my truck shortly. EDIT: That's not it.

Got ver 6.2.2 tonight according to Ford pass.