You wonāt even have to go back in all probability. Once itās announced on PTS that techs can now apply the update the SA can go to the FSA verification located under the Diagnostics menu and click the verify button to get the code and put that in the required section to clear the recall.
Ummm yeah. I have.
And there's a difference between software that is physically available to download and apply using FDRS,....and Ford not telling techs that it's okay to apply those updates now to satisfy 25C69.
The software updates are to the PCM and SOBDMC (AKA rear motor resolver...
There is even a service tool routine in FDRS for the BCM module to correct the 12V battery charging settings back to what they're supposed to be in the event that somebody (using FORScan, I assume) has tweaked the settings inappropriately. It's listed under the Programmable Settings tab in FDRS.
Regarding the whole FTCP ('Mannequin' demo/service date issue)...On my '23 GT Mach-E it got put in to FTCP purgatory for 60 days by accident (I expressed an interest to my salesman to trade my '21 model in, and I was literally 24hrs too late, as the '23 model had already gotten put on the...
So I did the update...but the software verification afterward errored (not the actual update process, that went fine)....and it's pretty obvious why; 1) Ford hasn't announced that the software is available for '22/'23 models yet (even though it's shown in PTS and FDRS, and 2) since it hasn't...
12 Mar 26 is that day apparently. Logged in this morning and voila there's a PCM and SOBDMC update waiting to get applied to my '22 model. So once it warms up a bit (say around noon), I'll get the gear out and knock that out and try the FSA verification to see if these are the two files that...
Well the Wolfbox mirror problem finally pushed me over the edge yesterday....just couldn't handle it anymore (that's my story and I'm sticking to it), I traded the Expedition in on a '24 Bronco Heritage 2Dr yesterday morning.
As independent operators youāll notice what looks like a āgenericā dealership code is pre-populated just above the TSB selection dropdown box. I have selected the FSA and verified updates that satisfied the software requirements in the past and received the ācodeā. Problem is since youāre not...
I have the 900 on my old Expedition primarily because it originally came without any backup camera or bumper sensors. The front and rear dashcam recording has come in handy.
What I don't like about this thing as a 'mirror' is the fact that as you've said it's still waaay too bright at night...
There have been reports of the trailer module (TRM) causing 12V battery drain and a software update was released recently.
The BCM controls when the 12V battery gets recharged by the HV battery. The threshold for doing this is when the SOC goes below 80%, if I'm not mistaken.
Agreed, there are some dealers that are part of the RAV process and they repair these buybacks and then sell them. And if everything was working after the RAV process I'd likely buy the vehicle. The issue I would have is the 'branded' title. I would want another discount beyond what the going...
If you're going to look for a replacement....I'd avoid the 'carbonized'...just sayin'...might have been an omen.....
Seriously, I hate to see things like this happen. Best of luck with getting the claim settled and whatever your next vehicle will be.
Checked for updates this morning and the APIM in the available software list has disappeared. So obviously the OTA took care of that....my new Sync revision is: