RickLightning
Well-known member
I've been trying to explain this to people for *years*.
Sponsored
I've been trying to explain this to people for *years*.
Yes - I'd be plenty happy with the 150kW (170kW in reality) if I could access the full rated power of every DC fast charger in the ground today. This would take an 800V nominal battery at many chargers. Change to 800V is MUCH more important than trying get to crazy fast power levels that will only be held for a couple minutes.The truck limitation (assuming FORD allowed the absolute maximum rate the truck could accept) comes down to the battery voltage (assume 400v, but its actually less, like 385v I think) and the maximum amperage of the charging station. I think the max amperage offered at DC fast chargers is 500 AMP, so
400v X 500 AMPs = 200 KW. That would be the theoretical max the truck could accept and actually slight less if you did 385v X 500 amps.
Regardless, what matters most is charging curve, and even compared to 800v vehicles, the lightnings charging curve from 10-80% is very comparable to Rivian and the Hummer EV, so probably spend less than 10 extra minutes at a charger on average compared to the ideal chargers the other trucks may offer.
It's in the 330V territory at lower states of charge and around 390V when fully charged. So you're not going to be able to pull more than 165 kW at low states of charge. I've seen up to 172 kW but I'm assuming that this reflects losses to battery and cabin conditioning.but its actually less, like 385v
And the reality is that a lot of charging stations have it set much lower.It's in the 330V territory at lower states of charge and around 390V when fully charged. So you're not going to be able to pull more than 165 kW at low states of charge. I've seen up to 172 kW but I'm assuming that this reflects losses to battery and cabin conditioning.
That's simply not true.All ev’s take about 45 minutes to an hour to charge or they well get hurt.