Reduce your PID's in the scope function to only that one so there isn't any chance of mixup.
If still wrong, compare to the live reading at the bottom right of FORScan and see if it tracks.
This sounds like a CP or PP signal issue. You can check these via CarScanner Pro and and an OBD dongle. Do you have that? I'll instruct you on what PID's to look at and what behavior to confirm.
Just like all configuration changes Ford "interrogates" the truck occasionally and can know (if they cared) that anyone has made a change to any configuration on any module. They don't seem to care thank goodness and I honestly think that part of the reason is they can barely keep the trucks...
What, I swear I've seen Lightnings with CCS2 before. Weren't they on the passenger side port opening on the 22 & 23s
Explain the issue you're having with the lock, specifically, is there a sequence issue, is it not locking and you think you need the lock?
I would like to purchase your CCS1 port.
There aren't any configuration options for the SOBDMA, but there may be different firmware for the European port.
If you can find an equivalent truck that came with the port over there we can look at the VINs of both and compare firmware.
FORScan is not Ford's software, It's a tool developed by a super smart Russian software guy named Alexey Savin. Not sure the exact point of your post, but I suspect it's aimed at how Ford's vehicle software is lacking in technology/capability compared to Tesla. This is a much deeper issue and...
Yes you need to call the BEV team and demand they get with your dealer and cover ALL your expenses.
Even Ford refers to the SOBDMA as the BCCM in some of their narratives, probably because they know how ridiculous their module acronyms are.
First time I've seen someone say "It's better to use easy mode for the sccm module" but this is great general advice. If you can accomplish something by using easy mode by all means, it eliminates the risk of accidentally messing with the wrong memory location.
Yea, if this was to be done you'd want to have a DCDC that could transfer the power DC to the truck that way you could match the SoC use of the packs to masimize range, then like you said, you'd charge both at the same time with 2 DC fast chargers, but sadly it get's real messy and complicated...
They wouldn't do it for that reason alone, look at all the other stuff that is dependent on the correct configuration to work or at min not throw DTCs. It's very odd that the BECM is one of the modules that the community does NOT have the configuration map to yet we know it has a huge config...
I want to post this here to address a bit of confusion around a few posts @Martin Rebuilds has made on FB in reaction to OoS Rebuild's video (Alex) doing battery swaps with "no programming required". A mutual friend of ours, the late Pat Cheung was the facilities/maintenance director at Florida...
@Ford Motor Company will never release code to be open source then placed into vehicles. This would introduce all kinds of safety/warranty issues when they can barely manage things as they are.
They could however implement some kind of bounty program where a seasoned software engineer would...
Yes, until a Battery or BMS Engineer comes fwd and/or tears apart the BMS (PCB) of one of these we can only speculate. There are many different passive balancing hardware and software strategies. Every 8 cells could share a resistor and that resistor is passed/shunted across different cells...
This is interesting the 48hr thing. I can't fathom why Ford would've done this and/or how no one has brought this to light yet. For most people I guess this never comes into play. For an ever day driver most people aren't leaving their trick idle (and not fully charged) for more than 48hrs at...
The two harnesses are shipped to china for manufacturing quotes. As soon as that returns with a lead time and price we will put up pre-orders, probably in April.