I don't disagree, but the GOM almost always gives what the battery has at rest, which indicates either really good news for the SR or some really shitty news for the ER.25% over EPA versus 10% under EPA if standard or extended respectively. The safe answer would be this is extended range and weather conditions or trip history are derating the GOM. However, the truck is at a level 2 charger suggesting this is not traveling long distance and needing a DCFC recharge. So I'll hope this is on a SR and this photo is posed - why else the emphasis on the GOM?
Looks like it was 38F in Detroit today, and Levine might have been trying to show the welcome graphic and not make a grand point about SR exceeding expectations. I'm going with ER, which isn't that bad at that temperature if being honest with the range guess ?I don't disagree, but the GOM almost always gives what the battery has at rest, which indicates either really good news for the SR or some really shitty news for the ER.
The GOM is not estimating any kind of real world range - that only happens when driving.
My guess would be that is the ER and the range is down due to the cold. Welcome to the world of EV's, cold weather is a killer on range.I don't disagree, but the GOM almost always gives what the battery has at rest, which indicates either really good news for the SR or some really shitty news for the ER.
The GOM is not estimating any kind of real world range - that only happens when driving.
grill", mirrors and wheels combo suggests xlt er
I asked the question, I didn’t say it was the SR.Not sure why OP assumed standard range.
You can look at the hubs and see it is an extended range.
Plus, 288 range on standard is 3miles/kwh. Which can totally be achieved in a truck. . . going down hill.
C'mon people with the battery size it's elementary math to come up with range expectations, and I'm afraid that any standard driving will net likely a maximum of 245... Not like you'd really notice it as that's driving city streets.
288 range is pretty much exactly where a lot of people will likely be very happy to get for efficiency... 2.2miles/kwh X 131 is 288.
Where is the difference? Those bumpers the same to me.the only way to tell is by the lower portion of the front bumper:
You didn't ask... You clearly stated it is the SR in the title of your post.I asked the question, I didn’t say it was the SR.
My post is asking if it could be an SR..... the Title was modified by Admin, I never put that title on this thread.You didn't ask... You clearly stated it is the SR in the title of your post.
It's not the SR. Your post is incorrect.