Maquis
Well-known member
Since the chemistry is nearly identical, I’d expect that to work on the Lightning.For the MME we have a HV Battery Calibration Procedure tutorial on the forum. Do you guys do anything like that on the Lightning?
Sponsored
Since the chemistry is nearly identical, I’d expect that to work on the Lightning.For the MME we have a HV Battery Calibration Procedure tutorial on the forum. Do you guys do anything like that on the Lightning?
I don't think that is necessary, all it will do is maybe adjust the guess-o-meter's estimate...I think it is best to just ignore the range estimate and concentrate on the SOC kWh remaining and your mi/kWh.For the MME we have a HV Battery Calibration Procedure tutorial on the forum. Do you guys do anything like that on the Lightning?
PS: slow charging with give the BMS more time to make a better estimate, so lower the current to whatever gives you sufficient range for your use.I don't think that is necessary, all it will do is maybe adjust the guess-o-meter's estimate...I think it is best to just ignore the range estimate and concentrate on the SOC kWh remaining and your mi/kWh.
It is imo putting unneeded stress on the battery to go down to 10% and up to 100%.
Stick with what works for you and the Ford recommendation of charging to 90% most of the time, only to 100% for a long trip.
Mine did it again this morning too and it’s been consistently cold (under 30F). Parked last night at 89% and when driving a few mins this morning it was 91%.I got antsy that something was happening with my truck, so I plugged in the scanner and watched the values. When I unplug, its 90, then I drive a few minutes and its up to 92 or 93. The "kWh remaining" stays the same, so it seems to be an algorithm thing. I did notice that my max charge kWh has risen to 136.8 from 131.2, so maybe it has something to do with that? I don't know. All I am seeing is that the computer is trying to estimate the remaining energy and isn't doing a consistent job of it.