Sponsored

AC charge speed derate at 92%

Heliian

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
2,079
Reaction score
2,416
Location
Canada
Vehicles
2023 LR Lariat, code name "Boogaloo"
Amps and kw are 2 different things.

I think people also tend to overanalyze their obd scanner readings.
Sponsored

 

chriserx

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Oct 3, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
766
Reaction score
600
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
2025 Ford Lightning Flash Job 2 😭
Do you record log files with Car Scanner, if so look at the AC Charge COupler Temperature to see if it's spiking!!! Hope it's not as that would indicate a problem with either the port in the truck, since your seeing the same with your EVSE and the one at work, we can assume they aren't the problem.

Of course if you don't see abnormal temps, ie. 136 degrees is what I just experienced charging my truck from 83% to 95%, I never seen a derating during the entire process, then you might have other issues with the hardware of software on the truck.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the start of the process the HVB was very cold, so half the energy went to the PTC to warm it up as seen on second photo bottom graph 6.37 kW for warming (Cabin HVAC OFF) and 9.5kW was to charging (80 AMP EVSE), Emporia monitor showing 17.9 kW energy flow.

1772585248292-h8.webp
1772585270530-jl.webp
1772585407750-bu.webp


At this point 26 minutes the battery reached acceptable temp for full rate charging, PTC energy shut down to 0 kW, EVSE continued plugging along

1772585512159-bh.webp
1772585601009-d7.webp
1772585628137-jw.webp


I started monitoring the AC Charge Couple temperature on the bottom graph at this point (middle photo) input energy is consistent, no sign of derating.

1772585791647-ns.webp
1772585817805-29.webp
1772585849448-fn.webp


Now at 94%, all is running fine, coupler temp 136.4 degrees, input energy stable

1772585990409-06.webp
1772586004761-30.webp
1772586066418-et.webp


Hit the 95% point, it didn't auto stop because I had the truck "running" to keep the data feed going to car scanner with out interruption, I manually shut it down, ending results.

1772586164724-0a.webp
1772586184203-fg.webp
1772586205338-9j.webp


Charging statistics for the fun of it............

1772586957746-15.webp
1772586974372-4d.webp
1772586996504-my.webp

1772587087706-67.png
Excellent, answered my remaining questions about the PTC, including both how it looks at the charger/ford app (just looks like charging) and amp cost at the charger (25-30, daymmm)
 

chl

Well-known member
First Name
CHRIS
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Threads
9
Messages
3,911
Reaction score
2,424
Location
alexandria virginia
Vehicles
2023 LIGHTNING PRO, 2012 Nissan Leaf, 2015 Toyota Prius, 2000 HD 883 Sportster
Occupation
Patent Atty / Electrical Engineer
So if we assume the BMS for the HVB is doing its job when it derated the current, what could the reasons be?

As mentioned above battery temperature could be a reason - if the battery cooling system is not working effectively that could be an issue I imagine.

A poor SOH degraded battery - the OP's battery reportedly has a 98% SOH so that doesn't seem to be a factor.

Cell imbalance - the BMS might be trying to balance cells/modules and if the imbalance if high, that could be a reason, again it's an 'I guess.'

The OP shows a 4.76% module variation / imbalance. I am not 100% positive, but that seems to me could indicate a bad battery module?

The charge curve for an EV battery up to 80% SOC or so is a constant current curve, the EVSE delivering max current (controlling the voltage).

Above that level it switches to a constant voltage method and the current reduces.

That change is most dramatic in DC Fast charging where high initial currents are being used, but it is also normal in AC charging though may not be very noticeable.

The OP has a very noticeable drop in current, so that does seems to indicate a battery problem.

I suppose it could also be the BMS has an issue, but with the module imbalance noted, not as likely?

Just my guesses.

PS: as suggested, if the OP can charge to 100% SOC and then look for the module differences, if it is still 4.76% that would be a sure sign of a bad module.

Also if it can be monitored under load, when driving, esp accelerating, and if it gets bigger, another clear sign of a bad module.

There was a video about LeafSpy and various Leaf vehicles that demonstrated that effect under load dramatically looking at cell voltages.

Some signs of cell imbalance:

https://www.midtronics.com/blog/early-signs-of-cell-imbalance-in-high-voltage-ev-batteries/
Sponsored

 
 







Top