MidAtlanticLightningClub
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #1
Funny thing, the cost of fueling up my EVs from our solar panels hasn’t changed in the last month.
Sponsored
Don’t know if the raptor would be the best choice, not that it would make a great deal of difference. I suppose the raptor is pricier but not because of fuel economy.FuelEconomy.gov calculation with California prices. Compared the Lightning to the Raptor and the hybrid F150.
Lightning has $1,000-$2,000 per year fuel savings.
Yes California has stupid high electric and gas prices. Still worth it to go with the Lightning.
![]()
![]()
Graph shows the 10 year overall cost and savings.
Even Lightning vs the hybrid F150. The Lightning saves.
![]()
![]()
Link for anyone wanting to play around with it.
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/savemoney.jsp
I did Raptor because of I recently saw a dumb race against the two.Don’t know if the raptor would be the best choice, not that it would make a great deal of difference. I suppose the raptor is pricier but not because of fuel economy.
True. These would be the sales specific data that would’ve made the lightning much more marketable against the ICE. Or any vehicle for that matter, if you have a new soccer mom/dad suv that you use for these types of local commutes or even the occasional long trip because if you need a soccer/sports vehicle it’s not like you wouldn’t be stopping often for bathrooms and snacks. Why not charge at one of the many chain gas stations? You know you’ll be there longer than 20 minutes .How do we add the incredible time savings factor of not having to go to a gas station ever when we have a home charger? That’s the even bigger savings IMO.
Time.