Sponsored

Why can't Ford get it right?

inchman254

Active member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Sep 16, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
29
Reaction score
36
Location
Collingwood, Ontario, Canada
Vehicles
F150 Lightning Lariat, Kia Telluride
Occupation
Retired
Adding a live consumption number is a no-brainer. The live consumption is actually already there on the GOM ... it just doesn't have a number on it. The same, really, as the actual % remaining number that was added recently on a software upgrade.

It might be best to have it buffered a bit, say, over the last 15 seconds, so it's readable and not changing by the second. It could also be presented as a graph like fuel consumption is shown on the F150 ICE ... maybe one bar per minute for the last 10 minutes. That way people could see the relative impact of going up and down hills, going into and out of wind, speed changes, etc.

There may be some complexity to it, as well. Heat pump cycling, for example, may not be apparent to the driver, so it may add some confusion... "How come my live consumption went up all of a sudden?". A split graph like the This Trip strip would overcome that.

But, more information would go a long way to reducing range frustration by allowing users to see, understand and manage the factors impacting range and giving them a semblance of control over their drive.

In the same vein of reducing range frustration, maybe even a notification at startup to remind people about preconditioning if the vehicle is started with a cold battery.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP

grange

Well-known member
First Name
david
Joined
Jul 30, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
54
Reaction score
66
Location
55347
Vehicles
23 Ford Lightning
Spot on!
 
 







Top