I am covered under the afore extended service plan because I have the LED light endorsement.Similar story... We collectively need to continue making a stink to Ford about this. The initial recall fix was not sufficient as many of us have now had the issue occur after the recall was done. It is 100% a safety issue... the white Reverse light ceases to operate if not replaced in time.
My experience....
1. February 2023 – 1st Replacent done under warranty for electrical malfunction caused by substantial water intrusion (first observed in December 2022, approximately one month after taking delivery).
2. September 2023 – Replaced under Recall 23S30. I do not recall whether the failure occurred prior to this service or if the part was replaced proactively as part of the recall.
3. April 2025 – Replaced again just prior to the 36,000-mile warranty expiration, due to similar symptoms of water intrusion and corresponding lighting malfunction.
At this point I have no reason to believe this wont be a continuing liability throughout the ownership of the truck. Hopefully I am covered under my Extended warranty but some have debated that. Either way even extend warranty doesnt last forever... it's a known issue and Ford needs to resolve it.
are you certain it would be covered? On this thread someone said that even with lighting coverage on the extended warranty it got denied.I am covered under the afore extended service plan because I have the LED light endorsement.
Please do watch keep an eye on it dude.Mines been fine since the recall and new part number. I’ll have to keep an eye on it.
Gotcha. I filed with NHTSA the other day. And I have the trifecta of water, strobe/dead light failure, and camera damage. Mine checks all 3 boxes unfortunately. After the recall…Anyone who has this re-fail should file with the NHTSA, it's quite easy. https://www.nhtsa.gov/report-a-safety-problem#index
By re-fail, I mean cease to function. Moisture in a light is not a failure, in fact it's by design in headlights and taillights. This light should not have moisture IMO, but if it functions, then you have less argument on replacement.
Great you did that. They have to act when they see safety issues like this, as part of what appears to be an unresolved recall...Gotcha. I filed with NHTSA the other day. And I have the trifecta of water, strobe/dead light failure, and camera damage. Mine checks all 3 boxes unfortunately. After the recall…
All true and totally agree that everyone needs to do their due diligence and file with NHTSA.Anyone who has this re-fail should file with the NHTSA, it's quite easy. https://www.nhtsa.gov/report-a-safety-problem#index
By re-fail, I mean cease to function. Moisture in a light is not a failure, in fact it's by design in headlights and taillights. This light should not have moisture IMO, but if it functions, then you have less argument on replacement.
I've posts where people with extended warranty w/light add-on are getting denied as Ford claims it is not a light and it considered a trim pieceI am covered under the afore extended service plan because I have the LED light endorsement.
Problem for Ford is that it is a light that has the required reverse lights to meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). That is the reason the light bar was subject to a NHTSA safety recall.I've posts where people with extended warranty w/light add-on are getting denied as Ford claims it is not a light and it considered a trim piece