A little more info.This is exactly why I like reading these posts. The disconnect, code compliant (line of sight) comment pulled it all together. Run whatever wire you want to the disconnect (assuming disconnect connectors allow that wire type) and then feed the FCSP what it requires. Gotta love these guys!
Hmm... code says "lockable open". I interpret that to mean that it can't be locked shut (or otherwise made inaccessible.) Here is a scenario--and, I bet, a common one. Customer installs 80 amp EVSE in the garage, with a dedicated 100 amp line running from a basement mounted panel. The EVSE is hardwired directly from this line. You put up a plaque beside the EVSE that describes where the breaker is in the basement. Does this satisfy code? If "accessible" means that an owner or person otherwise responsible for the property can access the panel, then I think so. But if the term "accessible" is meant to cover use cases regarding emergencies related to charging (say a neighbor notes that your charge adaptor is smoking and you are out of the house, she tries to disconnect but can't access the basement because the doors are locked), then I would say this is problematic.A little more info.
The disconnect can be remote (not in sight) if it’s lockable and you post a sign at the EVSE noting the location of the disconnect. And it’s only required is your branch circuit is more than 60A.
![]()
Lockable open does not mean that it cannot be locked closed. Generally, only disconnects for emergency equipment (fire pumps, for example) are locked closed.Hmm... code says "lockable open". I interpret that to mean that it can't be locked shut (or otherwise made inaccessible.) Here is a scenario--and, I bet, a common one. Customer installs 80 amp EVSE in the garage, with a dedicated 100 amp line running from a basement mounted panel. The EVSE is hardwired directly from this line. You put up a plaque beside the EVSE that describes where the breaker is in the basement. Does this satisfy code? If "accessible" means that an owner or person otherwise responsible for the property can access the panel, then I think so. But if the term "accessible" is meant to cover use cases regarding emergencies related to charging (say a neighbor notes that your charge adaptor is smoking and you are out of the house, she tries to disconnect but can't access the basement because the doors are locked), then I would say this is problematic.
What do you think?
Not just a junction box. Depends on local adoption of NEC and other factors, but the aluminum to copper transition usually requires a disconnect or sub-panel with separate breaker. But yes, aluminum from main panel to new sub-panel or disconnect and then copper the last few feet to the charger. This is definitely the way to do it if running any significant length.You can run properly sized aluminum to a junction box close to the EVSE, but the terminals on the FCSP are rated for copper only.
The last sentence (lockable open) refers to LOTO, not accessibility. NEC 110.25.Hmm... code says "lockable open". I interpret that to mean that it can't be locked shut (or otherwise made inaccessible.) Here is a scenario--and, I bet, a common one. Customer installs 80 amp EVSE in the garage, with a dedicated 100 amp line running from a basement mounted panel. The EVSE is hardwired directly from this line. You put up a plaque beside the EVSE that describes where the breaker is in the basement. Does this satisfy code? If "accessible" means that an owner or person otherwise responsible for the property can access the panel, then I think so. But if the term "accessible" is meant to cover use cases regarding emergencies related to charging (say a neighbor notes that your charge adaptor is smoking and you are out of the house, she tries to disconnect but can't access the basement because the doors are locked), then I would say this is problematic.
What do you think?
Breaker locks are typically a commercial thing, I'm very surprised they did that on a residential install. They're placed there so someone has to call the right people to start meddling with specific breakers. Or to keep people from switching on a breaker that needs to be left off.The county inspector came to my home and I said I'm not sure how to replace the lock. The inspector said, "I see this all the time, but you don't need to lock the breaker open. You may need to cut power to the FCSP so I don't recommend putting it back. It is not a safety issue to not have a lock, but it could be safer to not have the lock so you can power down the FCSP."
I am confused to what is practical, safe, and necessary.
Yeah, I’d strongly suggest a local disconnect. If your FCSP loses connectivity or needs reset for any reason, it’s nice to be able to cycle power without heading to the basement (or wherever your panel is located).Breaker locks are typically a commercial thing, I'm very surprised they did that on a residential install. They're placed there so someone has to call the right people to start meddling with specific breakers. Or to keep people from switching on a breaker that needs to be left off.