• Welcome to F150Lightningforum.com everyone!

    If you're joining us from F150gen14.com, then you may already have an account here!

    If you were registered on F150gen14.com as of April 16, 2022 or earlier, then you can simply login here with the same username and password!

Sponsored

Ram range extender

vandy1981

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
62
Messages
1,507
Reaction score
2,458
Location
Tennessee
Vehicles
'19 Jaguar I-Pace, '22 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Plumber
Maybe a convertible truck-drop the heavy battery and replace with an engine when you need the towing range?
That's going to be way too complicated for a mainstream vehicle.

I would be happy nema L14-30 inlet or J1772 inlet in the bed that would let you charge while driving. That way you could bring your own generator or even hook up an auxiliary battery bank in the bed or trailer. A 30 amp charger wouldn't give you much extra range though...
Sponsored

 

Maquis

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
2,869
Reaction score
3,480
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E E4-X; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
That way you could bring your own generator or even hook up an auxiliary battery bank in the bed or trailer. A 30 amp charger wouldn't give you much extra range though...
The things anti-EV memes are made of!

Ford F-150 Lightning Ram range extender D0D0AF68-6FB5-42D5-8AFF-2CCAAA138FE2
 

sotek2345

Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 7, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
3,535
Reaction score
4,076
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat ER, 2021 Mach-e GT
Occupation
Engineering Manager
That's going to be way too complicated for a mainstream vehicle.

I would be happy nema L14-30 inlet or J1772 inlet in the bed that would let you charge while driving. That way you could bring your own generator or even hook up an auxiliary battery bank in the bed or trailer. A 30 amp charger wouldn't give you much extra range though...
Yeah, 30A is only ~6.5kW after accounting for conversion losses. Unloaded and getting ~2mi/kWh, you would only gain ~45 miles on a 3.5 hour drive. Towing and getting ~1mi/kWh and you are talking about gaining ~15 miles between charges. Not really worth it.

I think you really need to be able to charge and sustain the drive. If you are getting 1mi/kWh while towing at 70mph, that is easy math - you need 70kW of input after losses (closer to 80kW before). that is ~110 HP sustained. Maybe drop down to ~50kW input (~80hp) if you are willing to lose range over time.
 

vandy1981

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2021
Threads
62
Messages
1,507
Reaction score
2,458
Location
Tennessee
Vehicles
'19 Jaguar I-Pace, '22 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Plumber
I think you really need to be able to charge and sustain the drive. If you are getting 1mi/kWh while towing at 70mph, that is easy math - you need 70kW of input after losses (closer to 80kW before). that is ~110 HP sustained. Maybe drop down to ~50kW input (~80hp) if you are willing to lose range over time.
I guess Stellantis could use the engine from a Fiat 500, then?
 

sotek2345

Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 7, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
3,535
Reaction score
4,076
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat ER, 2021 Mach-e GT
Occupation
Engineering Manager
I guess Stellantis could use the engine from a Fiat 500, then?
If you want to run it at 100% all the time, I suspect it wouldn't last very long!
 

Sponsored

greenne

Well-known member
First Name
Nathan
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
1,895
Reaction score
2,302
Location
Niskayuna, NY
Vehicles
2022 Lightning (Ordered 6/19, delivered 10/28/22)
Yeah, 30A is only ~6.5kW after accounting for conversion losses. Unloaded and getting ~2mi/kWh, you would only gain ~45 miles on a 3.5 hour drive. Towing and getting ~1mi/kWh and you are talking about gaining ~15 miles between charges. Not really worth it.

I think you really need to be able to charge and sustain the drive. If you are getting 1mi/kWh while towing at 70mph, that is easy math - you need 70kW of input after losses (closer to 80kW before). that is ~110 HP sustained. Maybe drop down to ~50kW input (~80hp) if you are willing to lose range over time.



That's close to how the Outlander PHEV operates where most of the time the battery drives the wheels--when the engine starts up it MOSTLY charges the battery. Only in rare cases is the engine directly driving the wheels (high speed highway cruising). The result is the Outlander *feels* like an EV almost all the time with a 1-drive transmission and EV like torque/power delivery. The key distinction being it can charge the battery faster than the EV motors depletes the battery. Here battery capacity never is the issue..only gas tank volume. The ICE motor by itself has something like 100-125hp which would not be adequate to drive the vehicle by itself if the system allowed the battery to completely deplete.
(Its operates closer to a diesel electric locomotive concept)

How Mitsubishi’s PHEV Works | Green Car Journal

Note: This is from the older model, I *think* with the redesign they increased the EV only and series only operations and now it only reverts to parallel mode at very high speeds or fast acceleration. The Electric motors in the redesign are much bigger and EV only range increased.

The kia/Hyundai PHEVs are different, whereas it behaves like a regular hybrid with a large battery. It starts out in Electric only mode(or heavily biased) and then switches to ICE hybrid vehicle when the battery is depleted. Toyota is the same way(sans the electric rear drive).
 
Last edited:

luebri

Well-known member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Threads
27
Messages
805
Reaction score
1,254
Location
Neenah, WI
Vehicles
22' F150 Lightning (Lariat ER), 22' Pathfinder SL
I think of it this way.

Ford is able to upsell the SR > ER battery jump at ~$10k for a reported and essentially theoretical perfect 80 miles of additional range / 32kwh. (131 ER - 98 SR = 32kwh)

If a range extender (e.g. Generator) could simply extend range and not touch the drivetrain in any manner could they add 80 miles of range / 32kwh during 3 hours of driving (time to deplete ~250 to 300kw of battery) for something substantively less than $10k?

To do so they would need at minimum of engine capable of producing 12kwh and be able to do it for well under $10k. Seems doable to me.

I would think something modular that sits on the top of the bed like the Ford range extender patents could be compelling to some buyers.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a34277725/ford-f-150-range-extender-ev-pickup-patent/
 

shutterbug

Well-known member
First Name
Joseph
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
1,168
Reaction score
1,130
Location
Phoenix
Vehicles
Mastang Mach-E Grabber Blue First Edition
Building a truck with both a large/heavy battery and electric motors AND even a moderate-sized internal combustion engine is kind of the worst of both worlds in terms of weight capacity and payload space consumed.
Also, two things to go bad instead of one :)
 

LightningShow

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
50
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
2,207
Location
MA
Vehicles
'22 Lariat ER
Occupation
Product Development
Ding, Ding, Ding!

Building a truck with both a large/heavy battery and electric motors AND even a moderate-sized internal combustion engine is kind of the worst of both worlds in terms of weight capacity and payload space consumed.

Maybe a convertible truck-drop the heavy battery and replace with an engine when you need the towing range?

It's all dependent on what they deliver. If you can get 200 miles of battery range and 200 miles from the extender at the same price point as the full BEV trucks getting 300 miles then it's going to appeal to a lot of people. Modern ICE engines aren't really that heavy, especially considering the range extender would be smallish engine, it would likely weigh less than the ~50kWh of battery capacity that they would likely be removing. I'd expect weight parity, more or less, after considering the ancillary parts needed for the extender.
Sponsored

 


 


Top