ZSC100
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #151
There's a lot of research in 2nd stage heat recovery using CO2 as a refrigerant to drive small turbine generators, condensing in a closed loop. Same with small modular fission reactors. I figure a micro turbine generator can recover heat this way in a vehicle, but without 50 plus mile per gallon targets/penalties for the ICE industry it will never happen. Gas is $2.09/gal in Tulsa right now; That makes an ICE F150 cheaper to drive road trips than the Lightning.I admire your optimism, and please realize that I am a cranky old fart, so weigh that in any interpretation.
But it is worth considering that the Prius 38.5% figure is already only at one load and one rpm -- every where else, its efficiency is lower -- and in many operating conditions, far lower. (The same is true but more extreme for the Jetta diesel) The Prius engine load is all over the place: the range of loads is smaller than in a conventional old car, (which operates at 0% efficiency when idling in traffic if the battery is already charged) but the engine still spends much of its time lightly loaded, where efficiency is dismal.
In my little PHEV the generator operated mainly at very high load, or not at all, at least in my imagination. But in practice, in charging batteries, the load is not constant, because the charge acceptance rate tapers off as the battery becomes more charged. (Also, if the vehicle is moving, then the drive motors affect the load on the generator.) I built a prototype second engine, which I never installed, but was not expecting better than 30% average efficiency, given its 36% peak. The generator was directly driven by the engine without any belts, or reductions.
I wrote up a patent, but did not file it, for a combined cycle system that would use an engine to provide household electric needs, with the waste heat going into heating water for domestic use, supplementing heat pump heat, (warming ground source water for instance) etc. The patent write up made it all sound feasible.... and maybe it is. Someone younger than me can investigate.
But devising a combined cycle mobile system seems unlikely to produce any substantial overall efficiency gain. Many people have postulated increased overall efficiency for turbo engines -- seems to make sense -- but it does not pan out. I did not follow precisely what you meant by
>> There may also be some CO2 gas turbine combined cycle possibilities with the battery to accept the power as things wind down..<<
Re shift in regulations, I am no fan of polluting more rather than less, but would support exemptions for projects like yours... both for prototyping and for possible subsequent sales in limited numbers, such as 1000 units. In my little PHEV, the regs were for motorcycles, so it was less of a challenge to meet than for a four-wheeled project.
Random thought: The electric machines (DC or AC) in portable and semiportable generators tend to be low efficiency. You could do better with some of the high efficiency brushless motors available... or a repurposed Leaf or Tesla motor, etc. A 3 cylinder Daihatsu motor laid over on its side with remote oil supply would probably fit under a Lightning, if the battery pack were reduced for space.
Your doing good stuff. Carry on.
Sponsored