Sponsored

evowner

Well-known member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Jan 20, 2025
Threads
7
Messages
197
Reaction score
220
Location
SW Ohio
Vehicles
2024 Ford F150 Lightning Lariot
Occupation
Retired EE
As someone with a degree in meteorology/climatology who has been studying weather and climate for 40 years, all I have to say to this is that if you're that gullible I've got some ocean front property in Kansas I'll make you a KILLER deal on.
Interesting. I know dozens of scientists who are now former and a couple of meteorologists and they tell me that climate change is real and that we are the cause of it. I will go with the smart people I know for my knowledge.

I had a friend that has a degree in Aerospace Engineering. But he still thinks that the 2020 election was stolen. Just because you have a degree does not make you automatically smart.
Sponsored

 

EV Engineer

Well-known member
First Name
M
Joined
May 22, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
49
Reaction score
57
Vehicles
2023 Ford Lightning XLT
Occupation
Engineer
30 pages wow.

Amazingly ---my truck still started this morning. No issues.


This feels like the engineering team and the sales team are at a crossroads. And ultimately sales matter.


F150 Lightning EV is a well engineered truck. It does 95% of what it needs to very well. I wish it was a little more affordable initially but now it seems to have reached parity with ICE.

The trouble is sales. People can't be convinced to go completely BEV. Doesn't mean it's a bad vehicle. But it's pretty clear people aren't buying the drivetrain.

Ford thinks EREV will sell more. I hope it does. We just need more electric miles everyday. However we get there.


EREV sounds incredibly complicated for what I need. I also think most ICE F150 users will just find it all a bit too complicated. I suppose FORD has data that it will sell.

I'm not worried about my truck. It'll last 15 years with some TLC.

I think Ford is making the right long-term call. Midsize trucks can probably get away with BEV only. The everyday truck errands etc. Large towing it's just too much energy requirements.

An EREV F150 is probably going to outcompete an F250 in towing capacity. This technology will probably scale to their super duty market.

This all probably makes sense from a physics standpoint.

I'm glad though I get a full size truck 100% BEV.
 

davehu

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Threads
56
Messages
1,139
Reaction score
1,134
Location
hot springs, AR
Vehicles
2023 Lighting Lariat ER, Iconic Silver
Occupation
retired
Ford is so far behind the times. That is the answer, better charging. It is insane to me how far ahead Kia/Hyundai is in charging speed than Ford and others.
kia/hyundai don't make pickup trucks. PU's are unique in demands for towing and hauling requiring which reduced efficiency and impacts range significantly. I understand and agree with their decision. My Lightning will meet my needs for at least the next 10 -15 years.
 

Sponsored

evowner

Well-known member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Jan 20, 2025
Threads
7
Messages
197
Reaction score
220
Location
SW Ohio
Vehicles
2024 Ford F150 Lightning Lariot
Occupation
Retired EE
That is the reality from the current administration. You are completely forgetting what China is doing and the infrastructure they have in place because the government INVESTED in the tech.

So imagine if we took the AI boom that we are having now and use some of that towards charging infrastructure, better battery structures, back to the American people that would be. Biden invested in the american infrastructure...you know for the american people.

But look at the economy now that people voted for. inflation, higher prices, tarriffs....all in one year. All that winning.
If a product needs to be subsidized by the Gov't, it will fail.
That is just not true. The government 'subsidizes' businesses all the time. Just look at the farmers. They subsidized High Efficiency HVAC products for many years. Hedging to slow the inevitable results of carbon based fuel is smart not risky.
 

The Weatherman

Well-known member
First Name
Dean
Joined
Apr 20, 2023
Threads
31
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
2,579
Location
South Central KY
Vehicles
2022 RR F150 Lightning Lariat ER, 2020 Explorer PL
Occupation
Retired
I am not sure what to say other than Mr. Farley appears to be a very weak leader, who has been unable to improve vehicle quality, and who flips flops strategy and execution in response to the slightest shift in the direction of the wind.

Most obvious is how he choreographs his future failures now so he doesn’t have to take accountability later - instead he can point the finger. I have been listening to him for three years now, and he does a brilliant job of preparing everyone for upcoming failure [ “Chinese car companies are better”, “we are being forced to make non-gas cars”]

It was Ford’s decision years ago to stop making affordable cars (EVs were barely on the radar).

It was Ford’s decision to globalize supply chain, and in the case of aluminum, to be practically sole sourced.

It was Ford’s decision to announce a $40k Lightning and then sell only builds at $70k and up for a long time.
I strongly believe Jim is short lived for his position. 👋
 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
106
Messages
6,558
Reaction score
8,922
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
So much doom and gloom in this thread…

I get it. I’m disappointed too. But look at the sales figures. Ford is a publicly traded company and can only lose money for so long before they have to do something. It wasn’t as popular as they’d hoped. We’re the vocal minority here on the forum.

I take solace in the fact that the Lightning will continue to live on as an EV. Yes, an EREV is still an EV - not a plug-in hybrid.

Plus, Ford isn’t abandoning EVs… a new BEV truck is coming and the MachE lives on.

We don’t know all the details about what the 2027? 2028? Lightning will be so maybe we should reserve judgement until we have the details?
No, an EREV is not an EV. ELECTRIC VEHICLE.

People can wordsmith all they want. ELECTRIC VEHICLE doesn't include GASOLINE.

A PHEV is a misnomer also. It's a Plug-in HYBRID. If you want to call a HYBRID an ELECTRIC VEHICLE, THEN YOU HAVE TO ALSO CALL IT A GAS VEHICLE...

Bunch of BS garbage they're using.
 
Last edited:

The Weatherman

Well-known member
First Name
Dean
Joined
Apr 20, 2023
Threads
31
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
2,579
Location
South Central KY
Vehicles
2022 RR F150 Lightning Lariat ER, 2020 Explorer PL
Occupation
Retired
kia/hyundai don't make pickup trucks. PU's are unique in demands for towing and hauling requiring which reduced efficiency and impacts range significantly. I understand and agree with their decision. My Lightning will meet my needs for at least the next 10 -15 years.
Ford F-150 Lightning Important Update: Ford EV Roadmap & Future of F-150 Lightning (EREV Next Gen Model) - ⛔️ ADMIN WARNING: NO POLITICS 1765906690056-7t
 

VTbuckeye

Well-known member
First Name
Joseph
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
980
Reaction score
954
Location
Vermont
Vehicles
22 Lightning Lariat ER max tow built Aug 22, 16 XC90T8, 22 XC40 P8 Recharge
13 year Volt owner, so I can speak from firsthand experience about EREV maintenance. Engines do not like to sit unused. So the Volt required you to run the engine up to a minimum temperature every 40 something days. So you were burning maybe a tenth of a gallon that you didn't actually need to burn. And if you only let it run that maintenance cycle and no more (no real load), there'd be issues with carbon build up near the EGR, oil didn't truly get all the water out of it, plugs didn't get really cleaned up, etc. Stale gas even with a pressurized and no vent gasoline tank, which means every start in cold conditions means you car reeks of paint thinner type smells until the cat is good and hot.

In the last year I had it (and also a MYLR), I had to think _more_ about maintenance with that car that with any pure ICE. Sure, oil changes were still 2 years apart, but I did more mental gymnastics about when to run the engine to accomplish real heating/loading of all the components.

EREVs are the best of both worlds and the worst of both worlds. We don't need the "best" in terms of longer range any more. For the costs Ford is putting into pivoting back to an EREV they should have had a decade ago, we could fill in the gaps in the charging network how many times over? And the tiny percentage of people who do need high towing capacity _and_ range simultaneously are better off with a diesel F250 or higher anyway.

This, combined with the timing of Farley headed to kneel before Conalld Rump, absolutely stinks of fossil fuel market manipulation / corruption. Guess I know how many Fords I will own in my lifetime (1).
I didn't have my volt that long, but my experience with the volt and Volvo phev is that my use pattern is not good for phev. Great for EV (frequent short drives). I could go 6+months on a 13 gallon tank of gas with a 18 mile electric range phev. This really is not good for it. Then in the winter it would turn on daily for a couple minutes. Not long enough to really warm up the oil/cats, but long enough to allow for more condensation and fuel to get mixed into the oil. Used oil analysis showed 8+percent fuel dilution. The oil looked like a coffee (not black coffee) and smelled like gasoline. The battery also got quite a workout 6C power draw regularly (80 up on a 9.7kWh battery) and cycled from 90 percent to 18 percent regularly (absolute battery percent, not displayed percentages). The volt was better than the XC90 due to a bigger battery, but it still had an ice motor that was infrequently used. At the end of our first summer it had a lifetime mpg of 250+, which fell into the low 200s by the end of its first winter. It stayed at 250+ for its entire life after that. If going with a gasoline powered vehicle I would want it to be conventional, non-hybrid, but I would also probably drive it less than 500 miles per year. Even if I have to charge on the road I'd prefer the driving response of our EVs. I like our lightning, but if I have to replace it I will be looking for another EV that will tow at least 7k pounds (sailboat plus trailer weigh a bit over 6k) safely the 15 miles round trip to the lake and back home in spring/fall.
 

Sponsored

davehu

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Threads
56
Messages
1,139
Reaction score
1,134
Location
hot springs, AR
Vehicles
2023 Lighting Lariat ER, Iconic Silver
Occupation
retired
True, the dealers are gonna be happy when you get app reminders to bring in your EREV for its 5,000 mile generator oil change and various other gas engine maintenance
oh no problem, you'll
Thank you for the update.

A big part of my decision to go with the Lightning is mainly staying with a proven legacy automaker, full EV drivetrain to minimize maintenance, and home backup capabilities utilizing the large battery without a noisy engine running.

While I understand the decisions and look forward to what you guys cook up, it does stings a bit.
exactly. I'm 70 years old and cespite this announcement I still expect it to last me 15 years. Sparky will probably be the last vehicle I ever own.
 

Lightning Rod

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2022
Threads
39
Messages
909
Reaction score
762
Location
North Coast
Vehicles
2023 Ford Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
CNC PROGRAMMER/MACHINIST
This is deeply concerning. Ford just caves to the anti-EV nuts and now after just a few years, us Lightning owners are all screwed. Farely needs to step down and go away.

I've been an F-150 owner for over 2 decades but like others have said... I'm done with buying Ford products. My girlfriend was looking to buy an Escape or another Ford SUV but now we're looking elsewhere.

Great job, Ford. (n)
 

MyJoule

Active member
Joined
May 24, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
33
Reaction score
54
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicles
'22 F150 Lightning Platinum
I've waited a few hours to get over my initial shock of this announcement. My take is that it is very short sighted of Ford to look only at the current sales numbers and decide to kill what is likely the best vehicle Ford has ever made. In my use case it meets all of my needs and I do drive it on road trips over 1600 miles 3 times a year. But only after we gained access to an actual working DC fast charging network ( Tesla) I have 2 complaints about my '22 Lightning that now has 37,000 miles on it. 1. It needs better software- which of course will now not happen (Anyone working to port Tesla's software to the Lightning? :) ) and 2. a new model would be much better with 4 wheel steering to improve the turning radius. I suppose a 3rd complaint is that it doesn't DC charge as fast as a Tesla ( I own a Model S too) so that 1600 mile trip takes a few hours longer than the Model S does. But I've learned to stop and smell the roses from time to time anyway.

I know it won't happen, but Ford should really reconsider the announcement from yesterday and go all in on their original EV plan Screw the dealers and the government. I'm very upset that when I decide to replace the Lightning, I'll have yet one more less choice.

FWIW- I'm equally critical of Tesla's insistence that everyone wants FSD and a RoboTaxi. Both are far from the truth. and don't even get me started on the Cybertruck's blatant ugliness. While it's packed with new tech, and I would have probably bought one had it not looked like a trash can, I picked the Lightning instead for it's practicality I knew going in it wasn't going to tow 300 miles on a charge, Gas F150s don't get 20MPH towing either.

I guess I'll keep my orphan for a few years before deciding what to do .
Sponsored

 
 







Top