ZeusDriver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2025
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 35
- Location
- East Coast, USA
- Vehicles
- 2022 Lightning
- Thread starter
- #46
Yes! Agree completely.Like you I had a Volt, which served me very well. If there would have been an EREV truck circa 2015-2019 or so, I would have absolutely jumped on that. The US auto industry screwed up hardcore by not coming out with a single first party EREV truck. Going through this intermediate development step when batteries were weaker and more expensive a dozen years ago made a ton of sense, and they all missed it.
Great idea. The generator in my microcar, the Zing, was exactly the same as the drive motor, and charged up the battery via DC whenever required. For most use cases, everything worked well, the vehicle was electric-only most of the time, and for long trips the engine would run. I was aware that if i wanted to climb the Rockies, I'd have to slow down substantially... the generator ICE being only 8 HP, but the drive motor being 20 (30 peak). However, the Zing was not intended to be mainly a cross-country car. It was intended to be very high efficiency without range anxiety, and mainly for commuting.Honestly I'd rather have a strong (~100kW maybe, the combustion guts and MGB from a Volt, for example) generator and a small battery buffer on a "drop axle" between the truck and trailer, with a way to hook that DC direct to the BEV truck. That way I'm only carting the combustion stuff for the few trips that might need the extra range pulling a trailer. And the generator can be left elsewhere for backup power the rest of the time.
The Ramcharger, however, is intended for long range towing, and I know from my 1990 Ford f150 days, that the 4.9 six, with about the HP likely from the 3.0 liter v6 in the Ramcharger would not be considered adequate for today's expectations. Even in the east, my Ford did not have enough HP to go fast up mountains when towing 6000 lb of streamlined boat. For me, that performance was fine then, and would be fine now, but many people would be disappointed, I think.
I agree here too, despite having had several. I had a Citroen SM (from decades before Stellantis) , which combined the shockingly awful electrics of a French car with the oil-burning (and occasional fires) of an Italian engine. Sure was nicely streamlined, though, and actually great fun to drive. I had an Alfa that was faultlessly reliable (mechanical fuel injection!), but don't think that the modern ones are. But the whole idea of a bunch of unrelated car brands grouped together does not appeal to me... especially since part of the idea is to find all the cheapest stuff from across brands to put into expensive vehicles.Stellantis products? Ugh, no thanks.
Sponsored
Last edited by a moderator: