Sponsored

EREV - A Horsepower Math Problem?

chriserx

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Oct 3, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
241
Reaction score
157
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
2025 Ford Lightning Flash Job 2 😭
I ran the numbers and came up with higher hp requirements than did Gemini, but either way the amount of power to keep a truck rolling is substantial. I think Gemini underestimated the energy losses. When using the power to run an EREV you will have both losses charging the battery and discharging.

Anyway here’s what Gemini says is the power to keep a F150 rolling at various speeds:


To maintain a constant speed of 60 mph on a level road, a typical gasoline-powered Ford F-150 requires approximately 25 to 35 horsepower (hp).


While these trucks have engines capable of 325 to over 700 hp, that massive power is only used for acceleration or towing. At a steady cruise, the engine only needs to produce enough power to overcome two main forces: Aerodynamic Drag and Rolling Resistance.


The Physics Breakdown


To calculate this, we look at the power required at the wheels (\bm{P_{wheels}}) and then factor in the efficiency of the drivetrain.


1. Aerodynamic Drag (\bm{F_d})


For a large vehicle like an F-150, air resistance is the biggest hurdle at 60 mph.


• Formula: \bm{F_d = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \rho \cdot v^2 \cdot C_d \cdot A}


• Drag Coefficient (\bm{C_d}): Approx 0.44 to 0.46 (Trucks are "blocky" and less aerodynamic than cars).


• Frontal Area (\bm{A}): Approx 31.5 to 35 sq ft.


• Speed (\bm{v}): 60 mph (88 feet per second).


• Result: At 60 mph, aerodynamic drag consumes about 18–22 hp.


2. Rolling Resistance (\bm{F_{rr}})


This is the friction between the tires and the road.


• Formula: \bm{F_{rr} = C_{rr} \cdot m \cdot g}


• Weight (\bm{m}): A typical F-150 weighs about 5,000 lbs.


• Rolling Coefficient (\bm{C_{rr}}): Approx 0.010 to 0.015 for standard highway tires.


• Result: Rolling resistance consumes about 8–10 hp.


3. Total Power at the Wheels


• Sum: \bm{20\text{ hp (Air)} + 9\text{ hp (Tires)} = \mathbf{29\text{ hp}}}


Why the Engine Works Harder


The number above is the power needed at the wheels. To provide 29 hp to the ground, the engine must produce more because of:


• Drivetrain Loss: About 15–20% of power is lost through the transmission, driveshaft, and differentials.


• Accessories: The alternator, water pump, and air conditioning also draw a few horsepower.


Estimated Engine Output at 60 mph: 34–40 hp.


Comparison Table: Power Required vs. Speed


As speed increases, the power required rises exponentially because aerodynamic drag increases with the cube of velocity (\bm{P \propto v^3}).

IMG_0060.webp
I'd say this was about right, at 100 mph I glanced at carscanner and motor output was roughly 90 kw, which puts it at 120 hp, wasn't willing to take my eyes off the road or do a longer term test other than that.
Sponsored

 

RLXXI

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
1,130
Location
3rd rock
Vehicles
2025 F 150 Flash, 2013 F 150 XLT, 2014 Escape, 2011 Suzuki DR 650SE
Occupation
Automotive Technician
Ford already fits a 3.5L twin turbo ecoboost or a 5.0L V8 under the hood. Remove the frunk to go back to a standard setup in the front of the truck and put the generator bit in the transmission tunnel and everything fits nice and neat. Shrinking the battery pack would also free up some room.
No matter, I won't be buying one that's for certain.
 

RLXXI

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
1,130
Location
3rd rock
Vehicles
2025 F 150 Flash, 2013 F 150 XLT, 2014 Escape, 2011 Suzuki DR 650SE
Occupation
Automotive Technician
here's a terrific explanation video of the upcoming RAM EREV, which will have the similar configuration of the LIGHTNING EREV... watch the whole video, as he is great at giving us real-world operational info...

Last I heard they cancelled the ramrev. I had a deposit on one and got it back.
 

RLXXI

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
1,130
Location
3rd rock
Vehicles
2025 F 150 Flash, 2013 F 150 XLT, 2014 Escape, 2011 Suzuki DR 650SE
Occupation
Automotive Technician
If they didn't sell the current Lightnings at a profitable price, what makes anyone think they'll sell when they add an engine on top of it?
 
Last edited:

gregoryhcain

Well-known member
First Name
Gregory
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
76
Reaction score
168
Location
Steilacoom, WA
Vehicles
Toyota 4Runner, Nissan Pickup
Occupation
Physician
If they didn't sell the current Lightnings at a profitable price, what makes anyone think it'll cost less when they add an engine on top of it?
I hear ya, I am thinking the same thing. As you can see from the energy calculations you need a substantial gasoline powerplant to keep this truck rolling down the road at freeway speed. You also need a fuel tank, fuel supply lines, engine management system, new software to manage the engine while charging the battery, etc, etc. If a BEV is already too expensive how could adding all this hardware and software pencil out. I don’t think this new Lightning EREV will ever see the light of day. If a BEV lightning can’t sell in enough numbers to be profitable how could this highly complex new EREV truck possibly be cheaper than a diesel F250?
 

Sponsored

sotek2345

Well-known member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Jun 7, 2021
Threads
33
Messages
3,870
Reaction score
4,647
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat ER, 2021 Mach-e GT
Occupation
Engineering Manager
I hear ya, I am thinking the same thing. As you can see from the energy calculations you need a substantial gasoline powerplant to keep this truck rolling down the road at freeway speed. You also need a fuel tank, fuel supply lines, engine management system, new software to manage the engine while charging the battery, etc, etc. If a BEV is already too expensive how could adding all this hardware and software pencil out. I don’t think this new Lightning EREV will ever see the light of day. If a BEV lightning can’t sell in enough numbers to be profitable how could this highly complex new EREV truck possibly be cheaper than a diesel F250?
Much, much, much smaller battery
 

chriserx

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Oct 3, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
241
Reaction score
157
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
2025 Ford Lightning Flash Job 2 😭
So with this truck, you may have to charge it AND put gas in the tank?
Not likely have to, but could. I personally take it to be in the vein of plug in hybrid EV, definitely could be wrong.

I feel like this could be pretty good in colder climates where the waste heat produced by the engine could warm the pack, and heat the cabin. I personally wanted a BEV for low maintenance and 'fewer points of failure' over hybrids.
 

hturnerfamily

Well-known member
First Name
William
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Threads
49
Messages
2,313
Reaction score
2,923
Location
rural Georgia
Vehicles
22 LIGHTNING PRO IcedBlueSilver 8/23/2022
Occupation
Owner
the RAM EREV is still on their website, just not ready to build or order quite yet

the SCOUT EREV is trying to come out of it's hiding, too.... hopefully... although expensive

the LIGHTNING EREV remains to be seen as to the configuration and battery pack size, etc.... we'll see

the only real Truck EVs left, at least in current production, are the Rivian, the CyberTruck, the Silverado/Danali, and possibly the upcoming SLATE "Lego Truck", which is enticing...

FORD may announce a Maverick or Ranger EV later...it remains to be seen.

The newly announced JEEP RECON may be alluring, too, as a Full EV... seemingly a cross between the Wrangler and the Grand Cherokee... hopefully will have some towability, too.

FORD's BRONCO and EXPLORER EVs are only overseas... don't know why.

Toyota only has a Hybrid.
Nissan? not sure...
 

Sponsored

ZeusDriver

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
78
Reaction score
54
Location
East Coast, USA
Vehicles
2022 Lightning
Wouldn't the entire case for the range extender (ice generator) be to put power back into the batteries? When would you use the range extender? not on your daily commute. You'll go home and charge there.
But when you are towing and need more range. That's the selling point right?
Yes, that and being able to avoid having to charge at superchargers. With a SR Lightning, I have too often made three long charging stops in a day, whereas I would otherwise have one quick stop for gas. A family member with a Tesla Model X has given up its use for long trips. Just too much hassle -- they drive their Jeep instead. If my Lightning had 400 mile range, I'd be completely happy with it -- but it looks like it could be a long time before Ford provides that, even though GM is already there.
 
OP
OP
Lytning

Lytning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Threads
12
Messages
635
Reaction score
1,044
Location
Georgia
Vehicles
Prev: 2000 SVT Lightning; Now: 2022 BEV Lightning
Occupation
Engineer
So with this truck, you may have to charge it AND put gas in the tank?
And, very likely at different locations for each “fueling”.
 

The Weatherman

Well-known member
First Name
Dean
Joined
Apr 20, 2023
Threads
31
Messages
1,789
Reaction score
2,526
Location
South Central KY
Vehicles
2022 RR F150 Lightning Lariat ER, 2020 Explorer PL
Occupation
Retired
the RAM EREV is still on their website, just not ready to build or order quite yet

the SCOUT EREV is trying to come out of it's hiding, too.... hopefully... although expensive

the LIGHTNING EREV remains to be seen as to the configuration and battery pack size, etc.... we'll see

the only real Truck EVs left, at least in current production, are the Rivian, the CyberTruck, the Silverado/Danali, and possibly the upcoming SLATE "Lego Truck", which is enticing...

FORD may announce a Maverick or Ranger EV later...it remains to be seen.

The newly announced JEEP RECON may be alluring, too, as a Full EV... seemingly a cross between the Wrangler and the Grand Cherokee... hopefully will have some towability, too.

FORD's BRONCO and EXPLORER EVs are only overseas... don't know why.

Toyota only has a Hybrid.
Nissan? not sure...
You can add a Kia EV Midsized Truck coming also. Planned launch in late 2026 or early 2027.
 

ZeusDriver

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
78
Reaction score
54
Location
East Coast, USA
Vehicles
2022 Lightning
here's a terrific explanation video of the upcoming RAM EREV, which will have the similar configuration of the LIGHTNING EREV... watch the whole video, as he is great at giving us real-world operational info...

Surprisingly good explanation, given that so much of auto "journalism" on YouTube is garbage. This is a clear explanation of how the Ford will work, too, given that there are not a lot of options for replacing a huge BEV pickup truck with a huge EREV pickup. If the manufacturer thinks that people want great towing range and capacity, and are willing to pay for an EREV that has a lot of power when running in electric mode, then they are pretty well boxed in to offering something like the Ram.

Ford will want to offer similar towing capability, and similar performance, which will require a large battery pack. They will also likely use a normally aspirated V6, a 4 being too small to keep up with the demand. It will be interesting to see the two side-by-side in the marketplace. There seems to be no limit to how much people will spend on pickup trucks.

For perspective, consider that an Escalade IQ can cost $180,000, and it is just a BEV. Ford and all the other large pickup manufacturers have added more and more luxury content, because much of that content is very high profit margin... and for reasons that escape me, people buy into that. To get your heated steering wheel, you buy a $5000 package for $10 worth of hardware.

Personally, I'd be happy with an EV more like my 1990 F150 4.9. Great at towing (but awful by today's standards) adequate performance (but awful by today's standards) today's quietness and handling, and a 3 cylinder range extender. $35,000.
 
OP
OP
Lytning

Lytning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Threads
12
Messages
635
Reaction score
1,044
Location
Georgia
Vehicles
Prev: 2000 SVT Lightning; Now: 2022 BEV Lightning
Occupation
Engineer
I don’t understand why @Ford Motor Company did not reduce the F-150 BEV Lightning manufacturing capacity to meet the market size. Then, reconfigure the freed up capacity to produce Ranger and Maverick BEV’s. The charging infrastructure is getting better every day. I expect the market share for BEV’s will steadily increase as charging infrastructure and vehicle choices continue to expand.
Sponsored

 
 







Top