antimatterparticle
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #1
So I have noticed that my EV juice box shows a higher amount of energy added than what the Ford App shows.
why would this happen?
update: in this charging session the final results are
71 in
64 charged
Which seems to be in line with the 10% mentioned here.
I am wondering if the 80amp Ford Charger is more efficient. (Wiring, less time to charge=less heat created etc). Can you track how much energy goes in with the Ford charger like the Juicenet?
but if this is the norm, people should be adding an additional 10% to the cost of operation.
why would this happen?
update: in this charging session the final results are
71 in
64 charged
Which seems to be in line with the 10% mentioned here.
I am wondering if the 80amp Ford Charger is more efficient. (Wiring, less time to charge=less heat created etc). Can you track how much energy goes in with the Ford charger like the Juicenet?
but if this is the norm, people should be adding an additional 10% to the cost of operation.
Sponsored
Last edited: