Sponsored

Highest KW AC Charger?

P-38

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 28, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
48
Reaction score
36
Vehicles
2024 Lightning Lariat
Are you at 240VAC for commercial voltage in Canada or 208VAC?

If you are at 208 getting to 240 would make the 80amp charger slightly faster. Maybe an autotransformer to boost it up, more losses but faster charge time and get preconditioning.

I'm poking the maintenance team at my work to adjust the taps on the 480 to 208 transformer as we are at 199 at the panel (even less at the truck)and going to the high side of inspec for 208 would net me like 3kwh over 8 hours... :)
Sponsored

 

Maquis

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
3,868
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E E4-X; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
Tesla onboard chargers will accept 277V single-phase and older Tesla EVSEs were rated for it. That's 22kW. I don't know if Ford's equipment - in the truck or their branded Siemens EVSE - can handle 277V without blowing up and I don't think I'd try it.
When the Mach-E first came out, the voltage limit was +5% (252). Some people with had supplies of 255-256 and the cars would t charge. Ford did a software change to raise the limit, but I don’t know the new limit, but I’d bet it won’t allow 277.

ETA - he’s in Canada so instead of 480/277, it would be 600/346 anyway.
 

Maquis

Well-known member
First Name
Dave
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
3,868
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E E4-X; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
Are you at 240VAC for commercial voltage in Canada or 208VAC?

If you are at 208 getting to 240 would make the 80amp charger slightly faster. Maybe an autotransformer to boost it up, more losses but faster charge time and get preconditioning.

I'm poking the maintenance team at my work to adjust the taps on the 480 to 208 transformer as we are at 199 at the panel (even less at the truck)and going to the high side of inspec for 208 would net me like 3kwh over 8 hours... :)
If it’s a 3 phase service, it’s 208, otherwise 240.
But your point is valid - charging power is proportional to voltage.
 

TaxmanHog

Moderator
Moderator
First Name
Noel
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
192
Messages
14,386
Reaction score
15,652
Location
SE. Mass.
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat-ER & 2024 HD Road Glide CVO-ST
Occupation
Retired
Ford F-150 Lightning Highest KW AC Charger? 1745460481528-l2
 

NW Ontario Ford Lightning

Well-known member
First Name
Robert
Joined
Feb 14, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
202
Reaction score
221
Location
NW Ontario Canada
Vehicles
2024 F-150 Lightning XLT
Occupation
Contractor
I have the Grizzl-E charger - and I recall they have some larger commercial chargers available - check out Grizzl-E EV Kodiac
 

Sponsored

P-38

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 28, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
48
Reaction score
36
Vehicles
2024 Lightning Lariat
Yeah he is in Canada so parts of it are 600/346 or 480/277...

Since Canada uses 120 for outlets like the US they must have transformers that drop it down. So typically in US that ends up with 208 3 phase. But can be high leg and get you one leg of 240. Or any other number of ways to get 240.

If it's 208 the max FCSP will do is 16.64 kW. At 240 19.2kW. I don't know how the FCSP would react if you ran 240 at the high end of "in spec" at say 250 and then voltage drop under load and all that...so many variables...

Just trying to help by pointing out the AC voltage level affects how quickly the truck charges, run the highest voltage without causing faults on rest of electrical panel, the FCSP or the truck and you will get the fastest charge times at level 2 charging
 
OP
OP

Ragman

Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2024
Threads
11
Messages
158
Reaction score
165
Location
Canada
Vehicles
2023 Lightnings - SR XLT, ER XLT, ER Lariat - 2024
Thanks to all, good learning's - it is the Kodiak's we bought (also have their Duo and Smart's) though note the Kodiak's are "designed in France, made in China" it's a rebranded Keywall. I'd dump it if I was them hurts the "Made in Canada" claims. No mention anywhere on the limitations and obviously missed that in the Ford documents (thanks again Maquis).

We have both three phase and single, as well as transformers if needed on voltage ends - we also have a 50kw DC charger that needed the 600/480 swap.

Those who have the 22/23 Lightnings with Dual Inverters consider your self more future proofed then the 24s - long term I think people will come to realize the dual chargers are actually valuable - we have.

Yep Taxman, trying to train people to swap out the cord at end of shift its just a hassle. We'll be swapping the one truck that we have the main "benefit" in being fast charged (its a single invertor) to a different one that has the dual invertors. Just another hassle due to accessories and wrap installed on it.

Now into the market for the best 19.2 kw AC charger ideally dual head (for our lovely single inverter trucks). The Duo's are great but error out if two trucks try to pre-condition (or just battery temp maintain) at same time.
 

SpaceEVDriver

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2022
Threads
22
Messages
476
Reaction score
894
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2023 Lightning Lariat ER, 2022 Mustang Mach-E
https://www.chargepoint.com/fleet/stations/cp6000

Up to 19.2 kW per port, relatively easy management software (well, the consumer level software for the HomeFlex works well enough anyway), and relatively decent reliability in my limited experience. I don’t do fleets, though. I think they may even be cheaper than what you have now, as long as the stupid tariff war isn’t hitting them yet.
 

tls

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Threads
19
Messages
437
Reaction score
407
Location
New York
Vehicles
2022 Lightning
If it's 208 the max FCSP will do is 16.64 kW. At 240 19.2kW. I don't know how the FCSP would react if you ran 240 at the high end of "in spec" at say 250 and then voltage drop under load and all that...so many variables...
I don't know about the FCSP but we are about 50' from the transformer feeding a long run up the mountainside with about 100 houses on it, and we routinely see 250-253V instead of the nominal 240 - about a 5% difference. Neither our Tesla wall chargers (the old 80A Gen 2 models) nor the onboard chargers in our '22 Lightning mind.

That would be about a 15 minute savings on a 5 hour, 100kW charge cycle. I would not mess around with a step up transformer etc. to get that. However, if already considering a transformer to boost 208V to a nominal 240V, then sure, why not go for 250V output if possible?
Sponsored

 
 







Top