Sponsored

Lightning vs old tech (or so they say)

22legit2quit

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
117
Reaction score
122
Vehicles
2024 Ford Lightning Flash ER
Greetings, please move to correct place if this is the wrong forum. I own a 2024 flash, which I am over the moon at its performance, cost of ownership(outside of the vehicle purchase price), and most importantly the chance of being a part of something that I’ve always found fascinating which is vehicle efficiency without the compromising the drive ability.

While I’m sure that most people here are enthusiasts to some extent, some are probably more than others, I’d be more of the latter.

Because I drive a fairly metered amount to and from work, I felt that with my round trip commute being 60 miles per day of work that translated to anywhere from 210-270 miles per week that I would be putting substantial miles on the lightning. Adding to the fact that ford has now effectively shuttered the lightning in its current form and there’s not a solid plan to reintroduce and what that might look like it was a simple preservation operation at first.

Very simply I wanted to see if we are moving towards progression with regard to efficiency. So for the “tale of the tape” here goes: 2024 lightning vs 2000 Honda insight.

The lightning is unmodified, I have a home charger which I use 100 percent of the time to charge because I have another vehicle for longer trips and that would give me more skewed data than the occasional traffic/weather changes that I experience in my daily commute. My typical average driving about 99% public highway is 2.4 miles per kWh. Which gives me an operating cost (fuel/electric) of 25kw on my round trip each working day. The going rate for charging at home is .10 per kWh, making the effective cost $2.50 each day not accounting for the depreciation, tire wear, etc. I run the climate as needed but in Arkansas usually the only thing you need is air conditioning which the lightning does much better with than heat.

The insight is also unmodified, with the exception of a slightly more efficient and powerful electrical system, I believe 8 ah compared to the 4-6ah stock. Otherwise no other modifications have been made to this point. It’s fairly low miles at 65k, manual transmission, ac, it even still has the factory tape deck in it which also works. I have plans to add certain insight specific devices that will increase its range and will add that to the cost as a bulk increase when that happens. I have been achieving 60mpg (hand calculated), post oil change, spark plugs and a valve cover gasket. Current gas prices here are below $2.50 for regular gas which is what I use, making the insight more economical to drive. The insight also has a lean burn feature that engages when certain conditions exist (it’s more than I’d like to list and kind of depends on where you get your literature), basically it cuts the fuel by about half. I have achieved 80mpg again hand calculated on an extended highway trip.

I am currently waiting on a response from one of the insight gurus on their version of this forum before beginning the data logging. If this goes well I plan to do the following to the insight while continuing to try and tap into the lightning the same as the insight:

Hot air intake ( yes this is a thing)
Nissan leaf battery and drive motor (much later of a modification)
Small solar array 1-200 watts is probably all it can hold
Upgraded egr (allows for faster lean burn)
Obd2cac and ima controller (allows certain aspects of the insight to be controlled by the driver and not the computer)
Better aerodynamics (grill blocks, potentially better springs)

I don’t currently have much that I can do with the lightning other than adding solar panels to get some sort of free charging but would have to add that as an additional cost.


Initial impression:
The insight isn’t as comfortable to drive but that doesn’t mean it’s not useful. The technology in the insight, imo is far more advanced than anything we have or have had. The auto stop actually works like it should as in you can coast with the vehicle off at certain speeds. Cost to cost the lightning was 65k when I bought it, the Honda was substantially less but comparing new to new the Honda would have been about 35k if it was new today(again an estimate). For what you get it is pricey or would’ve been.

Lastly, this is a hobby for me so please treat it as such. I am in no way an electrical engineer or chemist or physicist, just having fun and trying to apply some common sense. I’m grateful for constructive feedback.
Sponsored

 

RLXXI

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 10, 2021
Threads
33
Messages
1,595
Reaction score
1,411
Location
3rd rock
Vehicles
2025 F 150 Flash, 2013 F 150 XLT, 2014 Escape, 2011 Suzuki DR 650SE
Occupation
Automotive Technician
Comparing apples to basketballs aren't we? Can't compare a full size American truck to a Japanese econo box.

Technology wise or any other kind of comparison. Farley admitted we are far behind Asian made tech (Chinese) tech in these rigs.
 
OP
OP
22legit2quit

22legit2quit

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
117
Reaction score
122
Vehicles
2024 Ford Lightning Flash ER
Comparing apples to basketballs aren't we? Can't compare a full size American truck to a Japanese econo box.

Technology wise or any other kind of comparison. Farley admitted we are far behind Asian made tech (Chinese) tech in these rigs.
Not really. It’s more about comparing tech, operating costs and what is being withheld. A 25 year gap in production should account for some gain in efficiency. This is more of hit on how the older tech which should’ve been worked on, implemented and upgraded overtime to lessen this 18 billion dollar loss that the spin doctor Farley continues to pass on to us as consumers because everything was suppressed in the name of profit margin.

The comparison is more of a where we were, are and can/should be headed but again just as a hobby for me because I find it fascinating. I’m under no fantasy that the comparison does have flaws but to have the lightning so close in efficiency to what most people would consider to be the vehicle that has always been the one to worship at the altar of fuel efficiency is a positive for the lightning and a negative to whatever it is that manufacturers have been/have not been doing over the past 2.5 decades. I appreciate the input!
 

RickLightning

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Threads
108
Messages
6,786
Reaction score
9,248
Location
SE MI
Vehicles
'22 Lightning ER Lariat,'22 Mach-E Premium 4X
If you're getting 2.4 miles per kWh you're driving pretty slow.
 

Sponsored

Newton

Well-known member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Threads
12
Messages
519
Reaction score
701
Location
WA State
Vehicles
VW e-Golf, 2023 Lightning Lariat SR, Kia EV6, Toyota T-100
To be fair you would need to compare it with an ICE F-150. It would be more accurate to compare the insight to the Mach-E or Kia EV6, which I have and which would be getting around 3.5 mi/kWh or more in your conditions. My e-Golf would be over 4, it is really incredible how much difference the design of the car makes.

I'm getting about the same efficiency as you do I keep under 70 mph and have no desire to become a physics experiment at 90 mph. I was in a multi-car accident on ice and watching and hearing what even 50mph crashes look like from the outside makes one's foot a lot lighter on the freeway.

With fuel prices around $4.00/gallon EV wins here by a large margin.
 

Jseis

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2023
Threads
45
Messages
627
Reaction score
1,043
Location
Washington
Vehicles
July 2021 SR MME, July 2023, Lightning Lariat
I commute 90+ miles per day in ‘23 Lariat ER. ~45 miles each way in 56 minutes. Average 2.38 miles/kwh. 56,000 miles on the truck. Summer higher say 2.45-2.5 mi/kwh and winter lower (heat) and about 2.2 mi/kwh. If I boogie into the wind on a cold ass rain driven storm day… that means 2.1 mi/kwh.

For 3.5 tons O’ fun to get 80 mpge is nuts. I can get better mpge in winter if I don’t use heat but I’m 71 so FTS.

The Lightning beats the Insight pretty easily on efficiency ’cause BEV.
 

TaxmanHog

Moderator
Moderator
First Name
Noel
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
220
Messages
16,100
Reaction score
18,098
Location
SE. Mass.
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat-ER & 2024 HD Road Glide CVO-ST
Occupation
Retired
Cent's per mile is a reasonable factor to compare the two use cases.
 
OP
OP
22legit2quit

22legit2quit

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
117
Reaction score
122
Vehicles
2024 Ford Lightning Flash ER
To be fair you would need to compare it with an ICE F-150. It would be more accurate to compare the insight to the Mach-E or Kia EV6, which I have and which would be getting around 3.5 mi/kWh or more in your conditions. My e-Golf would be over 4, it is really incredible how much difference the design of the car makes.

I'm getting about the same efficiency as you do I keep under 70 mph and have no desire to become a physics experiment at 90 mph. I was in a multi-car accident on ice and watching and hearing what even 50mph crashes look like from the outside makes one's foot a lot lighter on the freeway.

With fuel prices around $4.00/gallon EV wins here by a large margin.
You make a good point but the point of the comparison isn’t really to make it model for model. I know what the comparison would be between the two and it isn’t that surprising. I’m trying to see how it does compared to a gas sipping hybrid.

I’ve owned trucks my entire life and trying to make an apples to apples comparison of this engine and that engine always amounts to the same thing. Big engine=bigger power(sometimes) but definitely equals worse gas mileage which is what many people who might consider buying a truck whether ours or not will compare it to. Obviously an ice f150 wouldn’t compare in any way to the insight either.

This is what I would suggest Ford and the other major ev makers do is some sort of long term test to show the value outside of what would be obvious to all of us and show that the hybrid/ev non believers that there is plenty of value to be had here. It’s just for fun anyway.
 

Mach Turtle

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
192
Reaction score
206
Location
Central California
Vehicles
2021 Mach E, 2024 XLT
Occupation
Bum
Cent's per mile is a reasonable factor to compare the two use cases.
Agreed that cost per mile is a good measure, but it would be even better if it were cost per (some measure of carrying capacity times miles). 5 seats instead of 2 and around a ton of hauling capacity instead of...OK not sure how much the Insight could carry...should be considered. After all, if you have to make two trips to get the family to the restaurant, that affects your energy usage a bit. :)

Admittedly, the cargo area of the Insight (16.3 cu. ft.) is a little larger than just the Lightning's frunk (only 14.1 cu.ft.)...
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
22legit2quit

22legit2quit

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
117
Reaction score
122
Vehicles
2024 Ford Lightning Flash ER
Agreed that cost per mile is a good measure, but it would be even better if it were cost per (some measure of carrying capacity times miles). 5 seats instead of 2 and around a ton of hauling capacity instead of...OK not sure how much the Insight could carry...should be considered. After all, if you have to make two trips to get the family to the restaurant, that affects your energy usage a bit. :)

Admittedly, the cargo area of the Insight (16.3 cu. ft.) is a little larger than just the Lightning's frunk (only 14.1 cu.ft.)...
It’s surprising how much space there is. I’m 6’4’’ 260 and it’s never a problem.
 

Jseis

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2023
Threads
45
Messages
627
Reaction score
1,043
Location
Washington
Vehicles
July 2021 SR MME, July 2023, Lightning Lariat
The Insight compares very well for most motorcycles over 500 cc. Room for two out of the rain. Don’t have to carry a spare helmet.
 

flypony53

Well-known member
First Name
Rodney
Joined
Nov 2, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
189
Reaction score
230
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicles
Ford F150 Lightning, Tesla Model Y, Tesla Model S
To be fair you would need to compare it with an ICE F-150. It would be more accurate to compare the insight to the Mach-E or Kia EV6, which I have and which would be getting around 3.5 mi/kWh or more in your conditions. My e-Golf would be over 4, it is really incredible how much difference the design of the car makes.

I'm getting about the same efficiency as you do I keep under 70 mph and have no desire to become a physics experiment at 90 mph. I was in a multi-car accident on ice and watching and hearing what even 50mph crashes look like from the outside makes one's foot a lot lighter on the freeway.

With fuel prices around $4.00/gallon EV wins here by a large margin.
Agree here, these are 2 completely different vehicle categories. The insight hybrid would be better compared to a Hyundai Ionic 5 or Tesla Model 3.

I was doing a 90 mile round trip commute for most of 2025, I found I averaged 35kWh/day usage, so ~$4.50/day of electricity costs at $.13/kWh. I looked and it would have been ~$9/day assuming 25mpg at $2.50/gallon with an F150 hybrid.

Drove my wife's Tesla MS a few times and was using ~22kWh.

What OP is not taking into consideration is the frequent oil changes, brake pads, etc. I have had my Lightning for 3.5 years with 45k miles (25k from 2025), no oil changes to date, brakes are brand new, tires still have another 10k miles at least.
 
OP
OP
22legit2quit

22legit2quit

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
117
Reaction score
122
Vehicles
2024 Ford Lightning Flash ER
Agree here, these are 2 completely different vehicle categories. The insight hybrid would be better compared to a Hyundai Ionic 5 or Tesla Model 3.

I was doing a 90 mile round trip commute for most of 2025, I found I averaged 35kWh/day usage, so ~$4.50/day of electricity costs at $.13/kWh. I looked and it would have been ~$9/day assuming 25mpg at $2.50/gallon with an F150 hybrid.

Drove my wife's Tesla MS a few times and was using ~22kWh.

What OP is not taking into consideration is the frequent oil changes, brake pads, etc. I have had my Lightning for 3.5 years with 45k miles (25k from 2025), no oil changes to date, brakes are brand new, tires still have another 10k miles at least.
I took the frequent oil changes into consideration and any other maintenance into account. It will be noted. I’m sure the lightnings tires are much more expensive. What I don’t take into account that I probably should is actual downtime. With the many recalls that we’ve all had and still get, I didn’t think about if a rental car would be required in the case that I didn’t have a spare vehicle.
 

djwildstar

Well-known member
First Name
Guy
Joined
Mar 14, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
260
Reaction score
359
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2023 Lightning Lariat ER, 2023 Mach-E GTPE
Occupation
Information Security
Very simply I wanted to see if we are moving towards progression with regard to efficiency. So for the “tale of the tape” here goes: 2024 lightning vs 2000 Honda insight.
Here are some interesting data points on the Honda Insight:
  • The 2000 Insight was originally rated at 65 MPG combined (61 city, 70 highway).
  • It is now rated at 53 MPG combined (49 city, 61 highway) under the new 2017 system.
  • 2022 was the final year for the Insight, and rated 52 MPG combined (55 city, 49 highway).
  • The Civic hybrid is nearest 2026 equivalent, at 49 MPG combined (50 city, 47 highway)
So you can clearly see the technological progression here, comparing apples to apples within the same company and product line. The general trend within a given make and model is for a larger, heavier, and less-efficient vehicle each successive year as features are added to improve the new model year over the old.

If you've got $0.10/kWh electricity and $2.50/gallon gas, your lowest-cost commuting options are not going to be full-size pickup trucks.

If price is no object, the Lucid Air Pure RWD at 4.35 mi/kWh would net you $0.023/mile. The Tesla Model & Standard RWD would do nearly as well, at 4.17 mi/kWh and $0.024/mile. Other leaders are the Ioniq 5 RWD or Toyota bZ, both at 3.85 mi/kWh and $0.026/mile.

Burning gas costs around twice as much per mile: Toyota Prius is the most-efficient gas-burner in 2026 at 57 MPG combined, or $0.044/mile. The Hyundai Elantra hybrid comes in at 54 MPG combined or $0.046/mile, closely followed by the Kia Niro at 53 MPG combined and $0.047/mile. The Toyota Camry hybrid at 51 MPG combined and $0.049/mile also beats the Honda.

If your use case requires a pickup truck, the most-efficient available is the Rivian R1T Dual at 2.56 mi/kWh and $0.039/mile. The Tesla Cybertruck comes in second at 2.44 mi/kWh and $0.041/mile, while the Lightning comes in third with 2.13 mi/kWh and $0.047/mile. The Silverado EV is next at 2.08 mi/kWh and $0.048/mile. The remaining EV pickups (Sierra and Hummer) cost more per mile than the small gas-burners.

However, gas-burning pickups are even less-efficient: Your best case for a gas pickup is the Maverick Hybrid FWD at 38 MPG combined and $0.066/mile. Second place goes to the Silverado 2WD at 26 MPG combined and $0.096/mile.
Sponsored

 
 







Top