You are probably right, he rounded the power capacity from 9.6 to 10 kWh as well.4 seconds (truncated, not rounded). 4s is anything from 4.0 to 4.99 =It starts with a 4. If it was 3.8 or 3.9 you can bet that they would be very specific with their acceleration time.
With a bed that's large enough to do stuff with! Lightning ain't no city slicker truck.around 4.5 sec. Not as impressive as fastest Rivian, but good enough.
Farley was also quoted at 4 seconds in the NY Times article from last week, FWIW.They seem to be using the language "mid 4 seconds". He was clearly reading from a prompter and he may have just scanned right over the "mid" word.
Paywall, and written by NYT. But point taken. What are the chances of lightning striking twiceFarley was also quoted at 4 seconds in the NY Times article from last week, FWIW.
You are absolutely correct! Having gone from the Legendary 7.3 PSD to a Tesla. (Don’t judge me) diesel has been to this point the king of hauling and generally getting stuff done with its compression ignition mite! These days it simply can’t hold a candle to the insane torque curve of modern electric motors. That being said, the energy compacting of one liter of Diesel is far more than even the best battery tech pound for pound. Batteries will catch up, maybe not surpass the energy density of diesel but there will come a point where the transition will make total sense. For me, towing a heavy trailer longer distances is going to happen. I am aware of the trade off of amazing towing or the lighting for a substantial loss in range. Im okay with that. Charging will simply be more frequent when I do tow. That being said, she’s going to be my commuter 95% of the time and the range will never be an issue. I embrace the transition!!!I’m not a race car driver, so the speed only tells half of the story when it comes to a real world pickup truck.
The torque figures are also only half of the story… although we clearly couldn’t do test rides with a trailer, the engineers made it clear that drivers won’t notice any change in power while towing or carrying a heavy load. All that extra power is there when it’s needed to get the job done without breaking a sweat.
Purists will tell you their Diesel engines are better at hauling or towing, yada yada, but they aren’t as effortless under such loads. Taking all those torque and horsepower figures and mix in a bit of computer optimization and whisper quiet magic, we will be able to get more done, and never even feel the engine struggle. That’s what counts.
Even diesel locomotives have electric drive motors.You are absolutely correct! Having gone from the Legendary 7.3 PSD to a Tesla. (Don’t judge me) diesel has been to this point the king of hauling and generally getting stuff done with its compression ignition mite! These days it simply can’t hold a candle to the insane torque curve of modern electric motors. That being said, the energy compacting of one liter of Diesel is far more than even the best battery tech pound for pound. Batteries will catch up, maybe not surpass the energy density of diesel but there will come a point where the transition will make total sense. For me, towing a heavy trailer longer distances is going to happen. I am aware of the trade off of amazing towing or the lighting for a substantial loss in range. Im okay with that. Charging will simply be more frequent when I do tow. That being said, she’s going to be my commuter 95% of the time and the range will never be an issue. I embrace the transition!!!