JEB
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2021
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 576
- Reaction score
- 393
- Location
- Northern Illinois
- Vehicles
- 2021 F-150 Lariat Powerboost
Yes, with the Nano. Corruption remained. I thought the rescan fixed things when I saw that the FDRS summary screen came out clean, but @iceman77 dug deeper into the code and found other corruptions. @Bob_Mac rescanned with a Mongoose and also had corruptions. @Jesse-Infotainment always used a VCM3, which doesn’t use J2534, and never had corruptions. I don’t know of anyone who got corruptions with a Nano and subsequently fixed them with a rescan using a VCM2 or 3. But I think it would work because it would read the local data, which is uncompromised, and then reload it to the server.Agreed, you make good points. Question, has anyone with corruption using a nano or other alternatively gotten access to a VCM2/3 and re-did a network scan? Did it correct the corruption issue?
Sponsored
Last edited: