I need someone to help me respond to this if possible.

[NW Ontario Ford Lightning]

For my property, with a large Inverter-solar-ESS (Energy Storage System Battery over 100kWh) I use the truck as a back up power source only to supply a DC charger feeding my main ESS. This has two benefits, and one drawback:

The two benefits:
1. The truck can supply a low but steady power supply of 2kWh per hour = 48kWh per day if needed, while my main ESS-inverters can supply any load on the property (even a Dryer, Compressor or Welder) with no impact on the truck at all.
2. The Truck's AC system remains isolated completely from the property AC system. No-connection required between the two. The truck's AC system supplies AC power to my DC charger, which supplies 48v DC to my ESS. There is no danger/hazard created and it is very simple.

The one drawback:
1. Double conversion: 300v DC Truck to AC Truck, then AC charger to 48v DC ESS voltage. There are losses due to the double conversion. The losses seem low in use.

Admittedly, this is not an option if you don't have a solar or ESS-Inverter system.

Sponsored

 

[Jodokk]

For my property, with a large Inverter-solar-ESS (Energy Storage System Battery over 100kWh) I use the truck as a back up power source only to supply a DC charger feeding my main ESS. This has two benefits, and one drawback:

The two benefits:
1. The truck can supply a low but steady power supply of 2kWh per hour = 48kWh per day if needed, while my main ESS-inverters can supply any load on the property (even a Dryer, Compressor or Welder) with no impact on the truck at all.
2. The Truck's AC system remains isolated completely from the property AC system. No-connection required between the two. The truck's AC system supplies AC power to my DC charger, which supplies 48v DC to my ESS. There is no danger/hazard created and it is very simple.

The one drawback:
1. Double conversion: 300v DC Truck to AC Truck, then AC charger to 48v DC ESS voltage. There are losses due to the double conversion. The losses seem low in use.

Admittedly, this is not an option if you don't have a solar or ESS-Inverter system.

I really like that!
The efficiency issue doesn't override the numerous hurdles of bringing this other integration to coded commission imho.
My system is an Enphase legacy Iq7 microinverter-based 12.6kw solar array we installed ourselves.
Have the single Franklinwh battery with the Smart-circuit, and Generator Module upgrades.
I've been tweaking our generator percentages going back to the battery to keep the draw from house loads from crashing the truck's pro-power onboard system. (I have it at 20% rn). We are also using the cabin outlets to run our bedroom and our child's bedroom window AC units. (So we can access the whole truck battery.)
So far it's been frustrating but fun finding that happy medium.

 

[NW Ontario Ford Lightning]

Nice!
Our system is 13.8 kw of solar, on SRNE string inverters (two, with a third in the works as we plan expansion of the Solar to 18-19 kw (EVs are hungry loads to feed it seems).
For powering up, Air-Con can be a challenge - especially if there is no "soft-start" to lower the in-rush current upon start up.
I am not familiar with the Franklinwh-batteries, but
if your battery system can start up all your existing loads, then the Lightning can just be added via a AC-DC charger, supplying a charging current which doesn't have to match any of the existing loads on your ESS as long as you can normally start up these loads with your system.
With the 2024/5 model the Pro-power can be set to run with the truck off, in the Pro-power settings, which is handy. (not sure if this can be done with the earlier models now).

I set up my DC charger to 1.5kW to be a close match to our average 24-hour energy consumption (37kWh per full day) so the truck is basically 'trickle-charging" the main ESS battery pack via the charger. The truck doesn't need to match big start up loads, just match 24-hour consumption rate.
I am using the EG4 Chargeverter which can be set up for 240v or 120v AC supply by the user.

 

[Jodokk]

Nice set-up! I love learning more about these solutions.
Yes, I placed my Easystart Flex last week, and after some tweaking, it worked well. However, it did seem to go back through the "learning" cycle with the truck, as it did with the main house supply when firing up the AC. The first few times just slammed it.
As for the grounding challenges, I've pretty much decided to install an ATS, as several folks have mentioned here. The generator module in my Franklinwh system will be a redundancy, then.
The Franklin has to be tweaked by the installer to allow solar while the generator module is engaged of-grid.
With a regular transfer switch, the Lightning PPOB supply is just part of the main supply as far as the Franklin knows, and it will prioritize the solar, charge that 15kw peak power battery, feed the house, better adhere to code, and do what I want it to do. I have a 2022 Lariat, so I have to leave the truck "on."

 

[chl]

How exactly do you propose that happens when the chassis is isolated from ground by the rubber tires.

When you touch the chassis with your bare hand while standing on wet ground, for example.

 

[RLXXI]

When you touch the chassis with your bare hand while standing on wet ground, for example.

I'm sure I'm going to touch the chassis while standing in water with bare feet. Reaching just a bit aren't we?

 

[hturnerfamily]

this has been a well known phenomenon in the Camping industry for many, many years: called 'hot skin'...where the metal siding, or frame, or metal steps, etc on the RV give off a 'tingle' or small 'shock', when the conditions are right... usually when rain or moisture are present, etc...

I've had this condition myself...

"generally, "RV hot skin" refers to the potentially dangerous condition where the metal frame of an RV becomes energized with stray voltage, often due to a faulty ground connection. This can happen when an RV is plugged into a power source with reversed polarity, a bad ground connection, or a wiring fault. Touching an electrified metal part of the RV can cause an electrical shock."

this can happen with both 120v campers and 240v larger Motorhomes or fifth wheels, etc...
as both can use a 120v outlet, with an adapter, or a 240v outlet, with an adapter, as needed....

there are no reports that anyone has ever died or been hospitalized because of this

 

[RLXXI]

this has been a well known phenomenon in the Camping industry for many, many years: called 'hot skin'...where the metal siding, or frame, or metal steps, etc on the RV give off a 'tingle' or small 'shock', when the conditions are right... usually when rain or moisture are present, etc...

there are no reports that anyone has ever died or been hospitalized because of this

I've felt this very thing when I was setting up a solar array in my backyard before I grounded the structure. Once I grounded it properly, no more tingle.

 

[chl]

I'm sure I'm going to touch the chassis while standing in water with bare feet. Reaching just a bit aren't we?

Well, all I can say is ignore the NEC and OSHA codes at your own peril.

They are there to protect life, limb and property from injury when something goes wrong, like an open ground.

Many of the code specifics were written as a result of some accidental electrocution, fire, or other issue.

And, no offense, but the folks who write the code are the experts, not you.

I am not a licensed electrician, but I have a masters degree in computers and electrical engineering, so I can understand the code pretty well.

As a responsible human being, I would never advise anyone to ignore the code, cut an equipment ground wire, or otherwise screw up in a potentially dangerous fashion.

The code can be somewhat obtuse to the casual reader, I get that.
But I think anyone should be able to understand this video about generators - your truck outlets are from an inverter (DC-to-AC) generator that has a bonded neutral.



No point in continuing to argue about this, just accept that the code is there to protect everyone and follow it, eh?

 

[RLXXI]

No point in continuing to argue about this, just accept that the code is there to protect everyone and follow it, eh?

Perhaps you would be kind enough to point out WHERE I stated to NOT adhere to or ignore the code? I'm pretty sure that's in your mind, not from my mouth or fingertips as the case stands.

I posted what my local electrician stated as per grounding.

 

[v2h8484]

Well, all I can say is ignore the NEC and OSHA codes at your own peril.

Sure but based on what you have shown for your system you also don't have a code compliant installation. Separately derived systems need to have a proper grounding system including a properly sized GEC. This is clearly stated in the owner's manual for the Generac 6852 transfer switch used/recommended by many on this forum:

(p.7 in
https://prod-generacsoa.azurefd.net/manualsweb/manuals/G0068521/10000012180)

So, it's rather disingenuous for you to keep repeating the code compliance mantra when you are ignoring it yourself.

 

[tearitupsports]

Sure but based on what you have shown for your system you also don't have a code compliant installation. Separately derived systems need to have a proper grounding system including a properly sized GEC. This is clearly stated in the owner's manual for the Generac 6852 transfer switch used/recommended by many on this forum:

(p.7 in
https://prod-generacsoa.azurefd.net/manualsweb/manuals/G0068521/10000012180)

So, it's rather disingenuous for you to keep repeating the code compliance mantra when you are ignoring it yourself.

Thanks. That is what I was saying in that a neutral transfer switch with the truck is extremely unsafe because it makes all your house completly un-grounded.

Now with the alternate that most people are doing (standard generator input with ground wire disconnected) there is a risk still.
It is not from a short. A short to ground anywhere should still clear, because it can make it back to the truck on the neutral wire and trip the breaker (regardless on if the short is on the house or truck side).
The main issue is that if you somehow used your body to reconnect the ground of the house to the ground of the truck you would create an alternate return path (instead of the neutral).

Now I think the standing in a puddle and touching the truck analogy is quite un-reasonable because the N wire is still in place with basically 0 resistance. You would still have extremely high resistance through the actual earth compared to that.

It could be an issue if you could physically touch the truck with one arm and grounded yourself to the house (say the generator box) with the other. I assume that the truck GFCI is equipment safety of 30mA and not life safety (lower value).

In summary I think the neutral switching transfer switch to be the most dangerous option. Unclipping the ground wire does come with a risk that needs to be fully understood by the homeowner.

Neither option is the safest or code compliant (because there is no code for this new situation).

My plan is to actually get the proper backup equipment going through the charge port. Hopefully that will take care of my needs, and I will re-ground my generator inlet to only be used with non-bonded gas generators.

Sponsored