Sponsored

Elevated HVB Module Variation (Solved post 26 & 49)

GoodSam

Well-known member
First Name
Good
Joined
Jan 5, 2022
Threads
38
Messages
965
Reaction score
566
Location
93111
Vehicles
17CRV, 22 Lightning XLT 312A SR iced blue silver
Occupation
occupying space
Tried to charge to 100% last night and the app says it went to 100% but when I start the truck, the SOC dropped to 84. I think this is just an error with the fact I have my home set as a charge location with 85%. I moved the override slider to 100% but I think it's not taking. I believe others have reported this with the most recent OTA. The app also way over reported the amount of kWh ingested - no where close to what my EVSE reported it saw.
See this December 2024 note that Ford put out:
https://www.f150lightningforum.com/...able-to-reach-target-charge.23075/post-447399
This is SSM 53208 special service message
https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2024/MC-11011811-0001.pdf?utm_source=perplexity

Based on others with same problem, I would guess a bad cell in a HV battery module / array.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
OP
OP
bmwhitetx

bmwhitetx

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
May 21, 2021
Threads
48
Messages
3,179
Reaction score
4,603
Location
DFW-Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired engineer
See this December 2024 note that Ford put out:
https://www.f150lightningforum.com/...able-to-reach-target-charge.23075/post-447399
This is SSM 53208 special service message
https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2024/MC-11011811-0001.pdf?utm_source=perplexity

Based on others with same problem, I would guess a bad cell in a HV battery module / array.
Thank you!!! This is exactly what I am experiencing. I will try one more time tonight since I have deleted charging locations which a dealer may think is the issue.
 

ZSC100

Well-known member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Mar 29, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
717
Reaction score
852
Location
Tulsa, OK
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning SR EG 311A
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Where is it confirmed the battery only does balancing with external power?

Based upon my logger I see reduced module variation as rest time gets long.

https://www.f150lightningforum.com/...ency-via-custom-pid-logging.34523/post-641705
Love your work with the logging. I hadn't noticed you did that graph, but after looking at it now I suspect it's just a noise/fidelity issue as you're looking at mV change and we're only talking about +/- 10mV changing thermals from when the vehicle turns off to when it turns on the next time are probably causing the scatter in the plot. It's also what causes people to think their truck is malfunctioning when they see miles of difference in range from when they turn off to when they turn on and/or when the temp changes while driving for whatever other reason. In Oklahoma it's common to get in your vehicle for a 1hr drive then when you step out it's 50+degF cooler or hotter. The battery has zero insulation, so when air is rushing over that aluminum pack case it can really influence the pack temp.

My personal confirmation of passive only balancing is from basic analysis of the BMS Module inside the battery pack and evidence of what I've seen with watching the data from my truck. I've seen 6%+ before that was reset in one night to 0.2% after charging to 100, but otherwise charging to 90 every night.

Ford F-150 Lightning Elevated HVB Module Variation (Solved post 26 & 49) 1772485211520-f


See how small the module is (thin PCB inside) and how small the balancing wires are to each module. These two facts mean that it's only passive balancing and those wires can't handle more than 5A continuous by design? So, this is why it takes a LONG time to balance the battery at the top. Active balancing requires capacitors and a much more complicated BMS power electronics. Also, Balancing always results in a net loss of energy over the pack, more so with passive balancing so it wouldn't make sense to EVER balance an EV if not charging b/c the vehicle has no way of knowing your future plans, You might need every mile of range to reach your destination.
 
OP
OP
bmwhitetx

bmwhitetx

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
May 21, 2021
Threads
48
Messages
3,179
Reaction score
4,603
Location
DFW-Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired engineer
Well, looks like it's off to the dealer. Did another attempt at 100% charging last night and same result. Once it got to 80% SOC, charging slowed significantly and when it got to 82%, charging stopped and the SOC jumped to 100%. Starting the truck this morning, the truck showed 100% when I got in but as soon as I pressed Start it went to 82%. Same as others have experienced (one example).

SOC:

Ford F-150 Lightning Elevated HVB Module Variation (Solved post 26 & 49) 1772549562691-uz


Charge kW
Ford F-150 Lightning Elevated HVB Module Variation (Solved post 26 & 49) 1772549600766-es
 

The Weatherman

Well-known member
First Name
Dean
Joined
Apr 20, 2023
Threads
35
Messages
2,004
Reaction score
2,951
Location
South Central KY
Vehicles
2022 RR F150 Lightning Lariat ER, 2020 Explorer PL
Occupation
Retired
Well, looks like it's off to the dealer. Did another attempt at 100% charging last night and same result. Once it got to 80% SOC, charging slowed significantly and when it got to 82%, charging stopped and the SOC jumped to 100%. Starting the truck this morning, the truck showed 100% when I got in but as soon as I pressed Start it went to 82%. Same as others have experienced (one example).

SOC:

1772549562691-uz.webp


Charge kW
1772549600766-es.webp
Yep that should be your plan.

This behavior has, as far as I recall, always been a symptom of of a failed battery cell.
 

Sponsored

chriserx

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Oct 3, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
764
Reaction score
593
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
2025 Ford Lightning Flash Job 2 😭
Well, looks like it's off to the dealer. Did another attempt at 100% charging last night and same result. Once it got to 80% SOC, charging slowed significantly and when it got to 82%, charging stopped and the SOC jumped to 100%. Starting the truck this morning, the truck showed 100% when I got in but as soon as I pressed Start it went to 82%. Same as others have experienced (one example).

SOC:

1772549562691-uz.webp


Charge kW
1772549600766-es.webp
If you don't/can't immediately drop it off try a slower charge rate if you can, seems to be about 40A already but can't hurt...probably.
 
OP
OP
bmwhitetx

bmwhitetx

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
May 21, 2021
Threads
48
Messages
3,179
Reaction score
4,603
Location
DFW-Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired engineer
If you don't/can't immediately drop it off try a slower charge rate if you can, seems to be about 40A already but can't hurt...probably.
I thought the same thing. I tried 40A two nights ago and 32A last night. Same result :( .
Waiting for dealer callback.
 
OP
OP
bmwhitetx

bmwhitetx

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
May 21, 2021
Threads
48
Messages
3,179
Reaction score
4,603
Location
DFW-Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired engineer
Update. Contacted dealer yesterday and they said they could get to it today so I dropped it off last night. I made sure the Advisor knew about the SSM and gave him a copy (thanks @GoodSam!). He said he had a knowledgeable EV tech that would handle.

Got a text this morning that a battery module is bad, covered on warranty (duh) and is normally $7500. No ETA on when part will arrive. Says Ford will cover a loaner.

Being curious I bought a 3-day PTS subscription. Shows tech connected to FDRS and immediately did a Battery Health test. Then spent the next hour reviewing the Workshop manual.

Battery Health test shows cell 29 in module 3 well below average:

Ford F-150 Lightning Elevated HVB Module Variation (Solved post 26 & 49) 1772665992198-e5

My last Car Scanner look was showing a 0.130 V variation from average which looks to be pretty close to the numbers above.

So I join the "two module failures" club. First one was almost exactly 2 years ago. Module 6.
 
Last edited:

ZSC100

Well-known member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Mar 29, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
717
Reaction score
852
Location
Tulsa, OK
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning SR EG 311A
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Update. Contacted dealer yesterday and they said they could get to it today so I dropped it off last night. I made sure the Advisor knew about the SSM and gave him a copy (thanks @GoodSam!). He said he had a knowledgeable EV tech that would handle.

Got a text this morning that a battery module is bad, covered on warranty (duh) and is normally $7500. No ETA on when part will arrive. Says Ford will cover a loaner.

Being curious I bought a 3-day PTS subscription. Shows tech connected to FDRS and immediately did a Battery Health test. Then spent the next hour reviewing the Workshop manual.

Battery Health test shows cell 29 in module 3 well below average:
View attachment 112827
My last Car Scanner look was showing a 0.130 V variation from average which looks to be pretty close to the numbers above.

So I join the "two module failures" club. First one was almost exactly 2 years ago. Module 6.
Ford has disgustingly under advertised the module failure rate, I think it's close to 10%, but they believe if they keep it advertised/believed under 4% they can avoid liability (god knows they need it). If they would've handled it correctly like so many other things they shouldn've done it honestly would be no big deal. A competent tech can replace a module in just 2hrs. But that requires that they have one on the shelf. I've said it for 3yrs+ now, Ford should have an ER and SR standard module sitting on the shelf at every eCertified dealer in the nation,, that's only about 3000 of each. It would have saved them WAY more in black eye value than the cost.

When my first module failed here in small town Tulsa, OK, in 2023 with 50kmi, my dealer had already performed over 50 lightning module replacements. When my 2nd module failed at 90kmi they had done over 100. And every one of my friends in Tulsa with Lightnings have had 1 or 2 modules fail. It's crazy that ford is letting people's trucks sit at dealers for weeks for a 2hr job because they are too stupid and cheap to do the right thing.
 

Sponsored

ZSC100

Well-known member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Mar 29, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
717
Reaction score
852
Location
Tulsa, OK
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning SR EG 311A
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Update. Contacted dealer yesterday and they said they could get to it today so I dropped it off last night. I made sure the Advisor knew about the SSM and gave him a copy (thanks @GoodSam!). He said he had a knowledgeable EV tech that would handle.

Got a text this morning that a battery module is bad, covered on warranty (duh) and is normally $7500. No ETA on when part will arrive. Says Ford will cover a loaner.

Being curious I bought a 3-day PTS subscription. Shows tech connected to FDRS and immediately did a Battery Health test. Then spent the next hour reviewing the Workshop manual.

Battery Health test shows cell 29 in module 3 well below average:

1772665992198-e5.png

My last Car Scanner look was showing a 0.130 V variation from average which looks to be pretty close to the numbers above.

So I join the "two module failures" club. First one was almost exactly 2 years ago. Module 6.
This tracks with what you were experiencing, NMC Li usable range is 3.0-4.2V,, 0.13V variation is 11%, so you not being able to charge past 85% makes sense, the BMS couldn't hold back 95 cells while trying to pump up cell 29.
 

TaxmanHog

Moderator
Moderator
First Name
Noel
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
239
Messages
16,793
Reaction score
19,020
Location
SE. Mass.
Vehicles
2022 Lightning Lariat-ER & 2024 HD Road Glide CVO-ST
Occupation
Retired
And yet, here I am and many others with ZERO module failures, 10% is not likely real since we don't know for sure how many other success stories are out there.

The failure reports tend to find forums to gather more information regarding their negative experience and share with likewise affected owners.
 

PJnc284

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
1,220
Reaction score
1,390
Location
Garner, NC
Vehicles
2023 Ford F150 Lightning Lariat ER
It's crazy that ford is letting people's trucks sit at dealers for weeks for a 2hr job because they are too stupid and cheap to do the right thing.
Could be worse I guess. Ram has 1000's of Etorque generators on backorder with some taking 2 months plus. Took them about 5 weeks to get mine in.
 

ZSC100

Well-known member
First Name
Zach
Joined
Mar 29, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
717
Reaction score
852
Location
Tulsa, OK
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lightning SR EG 311A
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
And yet, here I am and many others with ZERO module failures, 10% is not likely real since we don't know for sure how many other success stories are out there.

The failure reports tend to find forums to gather more information regarding their negative experience and share with likewise affected owners.
Yeah it's just a guesstimate based on my personal experiences and what I've seen over the past 3 years. Also, personally I know three people who have had two modules fail. I guarantee you Ford is not counting double failures. We know there are just over 100,000 Lightnings in North America. For one Ford dealer in Oklahoma to have replaced over 100 modules seems crazy, but they have kind of touted themselves as being experts in EV service. And they have EV loaners, so it feels like they are going after the business.
 

Scorpio3d

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 18, 2024
Threads
33
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,748
Location
Texas
Vehicles
2023 Ford F150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
SS/IBA car wash owner
Glad you were able to get it in and figure out what was wrong pretty quickly but it sucks that that was your second failure! I have had none and I’m approaching 32K miles🤞🏼
Sponsored

 
 







Top