user-name-required
Well-known member
For my $0.02...
Early April I was driving around the greater Vancouver and Frsaer Valley area, all the way up to Squamish. Decently sunny spring weather.
I did 107km of driving on the highways (but highways with traffic, and then a twisty roller coaster highway, so averaged probably 80kmh or 50mph), and I got 27kwh/100km. With a 131 usable battery, this is an implied range of 485km, or about 95% of the EPA estimated 510km range.
So yea, the truck can and will get its efficiency rating. But if you are driving at 60-70mph or more, at constant speed without any slowing down for corners, traffic, etc., yes in my experience 400km (or about 250 miles) is probably accurate.
AND....my Guess-o-meter on the instrument cluster still shows an implied range of 400kms when full. Even though I know that it can do more.
Early April I was driving around the greater Vancouver and Frsaer Valley area, all the way up to Squamish. Decently sunny spring weather.
I did 107km of driving on the highways (but highways with traffic, and then a twisty roller coaster highway, so averaged probably 80kmh or 50mph), and I got 27kwh/100km. With a 131 usable battery, this is an implied range of 485km, or about 95% of the EPA estimated 510km range.
So yea, the truck can and will get its efficiency rating. But if you are driving at 60-70mph or more, at constant speed without any slowing down for corners, traffic, etc., yes in my experience 400km (or about 250 miles) is probably accurate.
AND....my Guess-o-meter on the instrument cluster still shows an implied range of 400kms when full. Even though I know that it can do more.
Sponsored