21st Century Truck
Well-known member
Yes, the drop in the retained heat curve within the traction battery will be of interest. I have a SWAG estimate but I'll hold my fire to see how far off my SWAG will be. Thanks for doing this.Completed the weekly charging of my Lightning just now, 45% to 90% took about 3.6 hours.
Emporia log shows 70.27 kWh for all of today's activities, conditioning battery, cabin and charging.
The FCSP log shows 69.995 kWh and ~$27.30 cost.
![]()
![]()
![]()
My weekly driving amount to a whopping 62 miles, lot's of departure timed warming or remote starts to ensure a comfortable ride for Mrs. Taxman, my miles per kWh {0.9} drops through the floor in winter for these reasons, resulting in 44.2 cent per mile cost of driving, which is well above my old PowerStroke, but the creature comforts of a warm vehicle is a winner with the Lightning, the old diesel was cold blooded beast in winter.
![]()
Some health statistics for the battery pack just after finishing the charging session.
The heat from earlier in the morning and heat generated during charging maintained well, it will be interesting to see how much is lost by Monday morning, we will be driving the Mrs. ICE vehicle Sunday. SOH is 98.5%, the LVB has been topped up to 99%, will be interesting to see where that's at Monday as well, I'm leaving the OBD2 plugged in to see if that causes severe impact.
The gross energy stored on the HVB is calculated to be 83% vs. dash indication of 90%
GOM range value of 270 miles imputed 100% value would be about 300 miles out of 320 theoretical miles, which we all know is impossible in this climate, especially how I operate and drive my truck.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sponsored